PL 54 · cols. 267–271
Leo the Great, Sermons
Sermon XL
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 267–271
Sermon XL
(a) ‹ut eam aut carceri› · printed under col 267
Sic melius ex ms. S. Petri, quam traderet et illigaret, ut in editis habebatur.
So, better, from the ms. of St Peter's, than "traderet" and "illigaret", as was found in the editions.
(b) ‹speciali insinuatione commendat,› · printed under col 267
Quasi pro ut melius substituimus ex Lectionariis S. Petri.
We have substituted "quasi" for "ut", as better, from the Lectionaries of St Peter's.
(c) ‹prolabimur, hoc› · printed under col 267
Potissimum pro potentissimum magis placuit ex iisdem S. Petri codd. et uno Vat. Paulo ante pro, quia facile, aliqui codd. habent, qua facile. Paulo post, ut remittat, loco, ut remittatur: et dein, optamus pro precamur in mss. S. Petri.
"Potissimum" in place of "potentissimum" seemed better, from the same codices of St Peter's and one Vatican [ms.]. A little before, for "quia facile", some codices have "qua facile". A little after, "ut remittat" in place of "ut remittatur": and then "optamus" for "precamur" in the mss. of St Peter's.
(d) ‹precamur ignosci.› · printed under col 267
Quesnellus notavit in margine sequentem periodum deesse in mss. Corb. et Thuan.
Quesnel noted in the margin that the following sentence is lacking in the Corbie and de Thou mss.
(e) ‹sanctum jejunium fideliter› · printed under col 267
Codd. S. Petri, peragit.
The codices of St Peter's: "peragit".
SYNOPSIS. — I Semper in hac vita proficiendum esse. — II. In id maxime enitendum Quadragesimae tempore, quo magis saevit diabolus. — III. Cur Christus
SYNOPSIS. — I. That in this life we must always make progress. — II. That we must strive for this above all in the time of Lent, when the devil rages more. — III. Why Christ […]
(f) ‹qui se› · printed under col 267
Ita cum prima editione aliaque Coloniensi an. 1547, aliquot nostri codd., et melius quam apud Quesnellum cum aliis vulgatis atque mss. ad opus horum. In sequenti periodo cod. Padiliron., potest habere quo recedat.
So, with the first edition and another, the Cologne one of the year 1547, some of our codices, and better than in Quesnel, with other common editions and mss.: "ad opus horum". In the following sentence the Polirone codex: "potest habere quo recedat".
(g) ‹consuetudinis nostrae› · printed under col 267
Plerique codices cum editis ante Quesnellum, necessarii aliquid addamus augmenti. Retulimus Quesnellianam lectionem, quam mss. S. Petri et Padiliron approbant.
Most codices, with the editions before Quesnel: "necessarii aliquid addamus augmenti". We have restored Quesnel's reading, which the mss. of St Peter's and Polirone confirm.
(h) ‹auribus nostris› · printed under col 267, continued under col 268
Et quidem eadem lectio Paulinae epistolae, quae hodie et in primo nocturno et in missa per totam Ecclesiam auribus fidelium insonat. Unde et officii ecclesiastici antiquitas probatur et refellitur error Theodemari abbatis Casinensis, seu Pauli Diaconi ejus nomine ad Carolum Magnum imperatorem scribentis. Necdum eo tempore, quo S. Benedictus scribebat suam Regulam, in Romana Ecclesia, sicut nunc inquit, leguntur, sacras Scripturas legi morem fuisse. Ex Gelasio aliisque falsa probatur opinio a doctissimo Mabilonio in disquisitione de Cursu Gallicano pag. 385. Accedit Leo Gelasio pluribus annis antiquior, tum hoc loco, tum pluribus aliis, ut sermonis 41 (nunc 42) seu de Quadrag. 4 initio: Praedicaturus, inquit,... quo aptius utar exordio, quam ut verbis Apostoli... incipiam, dicamque quod lectum est: Ecce nunc tempus acceptabile, etc.; Sermonis 50 (nunc 52), qui primus de Passione Dom., initium indicat lectam eo die fuisse passionis historiam ex Evangelio; quae et feria 4 esse iteratam significant ultima fere verba sermonis 3, de Passione, prima serm. 13 (nunc 15), quae hanc universae Ecclesiae consuetudinem tribuit. Vide et serm. 18, cap. 2, et serm. 19, cap. 1, ubi observat ex more decursam esse evangelicam de Passione lectionem, et serm. 2 de Resurrectione, seu potius in die Sabbati sancti, et serm. 94 (nunc 51) in evangelium de Transfiguratione Domini. QUESNELLUS. — Mox pro acceptum prima editio cum aliquibus mss. habet acceptabile, uti legitur etiam serm. 42, cap. 1.
And indeed it is the same reading of the Pauline epistle which today, both in the first nocturn and at Mass, sounds in the ears of the faithful throughout the whole Church. Hence both the antiquity of the ecclesiastical office is proved and the error is refuted of Theodemar, abbot of Monte Cassino, or of Paul the Deacon writing in his name to the emperor Charlemagne: that not yet at the time when St Benedict was writing his Rule was it the custom in the Roman Church, as, he says, they are read now, for the sacred Scriptures to be read. From Gelasius and others the opinion is proved false by the most learned Mabillon in his disquisition on the Gallican Course, p. 385. Leo, older than Gelasius by many years, adds his witness, both in this place and in many others, as at the beginning of sermon 41 (now 42), or the 4th on Lent: "Being about to preach," he says, "... what more fitting opening could I use than to begin with the words of the Apostle ..., and to say what has been read: Behold, now is the acceptable time", etc.; the beginning of sermon 50 (now 52), which is the first on the Passion of the Lord, indicates that the history of the passion from the Gospel was read on that day; and that it was repeated on the fourth feria is signified by almost the last words of sermon 3 on the Passion, the first words of sermon 13 (now 15), which attributes this custom to the universal Church. See also sermon 18, ch. 2, and sermon 19, ch. 1, where he observes that the gospel reading on the Passion was gone through according to custom, and sermon 2 on the Resurrection, or rather on the day of Holy Saturday, and sermon 94 (now 51) on the gospel of the Transfiguration of the Lord. QUESNEL. — Next, for "acceptum" the first edition with some mss. has "acceptabile", as is also read in sermon 42, ch. 1.
esuriens non mutavit lapides in panem? — IV. Non sterilem esse debere Quadragesimae inediam. — V. Miserationem et clementiam principum imitandam esse Quadragesimae tempore.
[…] when hungry did not change the stones into bread? — IV. That the Lenten abstinence ought not to be barren. — V. That the compassion and clemency of princes is to be imitated in the time of Lent.
(a) ‹et sollicitior› · printed under col 269
Editi, assumenda prudentia est. Praetulimus mss. S. Petri, ex quibus etiam paulo post terrarum scripsimus pro terrae, confirmante cod. Padiliron.
The editions [read] "assumenda prudentia est". We have preferred the manuscripts of St Peter's, from which a little later we also wrote "terrarum" for "terrae", with the Padolirone codex confirming it.
(b) ‹quos possidebat› · printed under col 269
Ita ex iisdem codd. S. Petri et uno Vat. Alii cum editis, excluditur. Paulo post, pro perdidit, duo mss. Vat., perdit.
So from the same codices of St Peter's and one Vatican [manuscript]. Others, with the editions, [read] "excluditur". A little later, for "perdidit", two Vatican manuscripts [read] "perdit".
(c) ‹negligentius evagantes, quas› · printed under col 269
Unus ms. S. Petri et alius Vat. cum quibusdam editis, per proclivia. Mox, movet cupiditates, loco acuit cupiditates in uno ms. Vat.
One manuscript of St Peter's and another Vatican one, with certain editions, [read] "per proclivia". Next, "movet cupiditates" in place of "acuit cupiditates" in one Vatican manuscript.
(d) ‹Domino nostro Jesu Christo› · printed under col 269
Ita cum Quesn. unus codex S. Petri, et alius Padiliron. Al., conatum.
So, with Quesnel, one codex of St Peter's and another of Padolirone. Others [read] "conatum".
(e) ‹sicut evangelica› · printed under col 269
Sic ex prima editione et nonnullis mss. Vat. et Padiliron., idque magis placet quam vulgata lectio, patefecit; nam apertius indicat tunc quoque ante sermonem in missa lectum fuisse Evangelium Matthaei de tentatione Christi in deserto, uti nunc in prima Dominica Quadragesimae legitur.
So from the first edition and some Vatican and Padolirone manuscripts, and this pleases more than the common reading "patefecit"; for it shows more openly that then too the Gospel of Matthew on the temptation of Christ in the desert was read at Mass before the sermon, as it is now read on the first Sunday of Lent.
(f) ‹quadraginta dierum› · printed under col 269
Exemplar Pauli Diaconi omittit, noctiumque.
The copy of Paul the Deacon omits "noctiumque".
(g) ‹Poterat› · printed under col 269
Sic cum Quesn. duo codd. S. Pefri et unus Vat. Al., itaque.
So, with Quesnel, two codices of St Peter's and one Vatican. Others [read] "itaque".
(h) ‹cujuslibet generis› · printed under col 269
Al., natura in editionum margine, ac in Homil. Pauli Diaconi et cod. Padiliron.
Others [read] "natura", in the margin of the editions, and in the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon and the Padolirone codex.
(i) ‹in convivio› · printed under col 269
Ita nostri codd. et editi ante Quesnellum, apud quem, nuptiarum, uno nostro Padilir. suffragante.
So our codices and the editions before Quesnel, in whom [we find] "nuptiarum", with one of our [codices], the Padolirone, supporting it.
(j) ‹magis salutiferis› · printed under col 269, running on to col 270
Al., dispensationibus, uti in Homil. Pauli Diac. et in duobus mss. Vat. At codd. S. Petri, ut in textu; qui etiam pro nequissimi, quod legebatur in editis, praeferunt, superbissimi, juxta emendationem Quesnellianam. Id autem magis placuit, cum humilitatis mysterium daemonis superbiae S. pontifex opponat.
Others [read] "dispensationibus", as in the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon and in two Vatican manuscripts. But the codices of St Peter's [read] as in the text; and they also, for "nequissimi", which was read in the editions, offer "superbissimi", in accordance with Quesnel's emendation. This pleased more, since the holy pontiff sets the mystery of humility against the pride of the demon.
(k) ‹non potentia Deitatis› · printed under col 270
Addidimus a Domino. ex duobus Lectionariis S. Petri, in quibus mox legitur, et in omnibus artibus suis tentatore frustrato, uti post Quesnellum edidimus, cum in caeteris editionibus et in aliquot codd. ac in Homil. Pauli Diac. habeatur, et omnibus artibus callidi tentatoris elisis.
We have added "a Domino" from two Lectionaries of St Peter's, in which there is read shortly after "et in omnibus artibus suis tentatore frustrato", as we have printed following Quesnel, whereas in the other editions and in some codices and in the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon there is found "et omnibus artibus callidi tentatoris elisis".
(j) continued from col 269, set in n269
(k) call in col 269; the whole note is printed under col 270, set in n269
(l) ‹Confundantur› · printed under col 270
Tres mss., igitur.
Three manuscripts [read] "igitur".
(m) ‹per famem corporis› · printed under col 270
Cod. Bon. et prima editio, vera humanitas. Dein ibidem et in tribus codd., manifesta divinitas
The Bologna codex and the first edition [read] "vera humanitas". Then in the same place, and in three codices, "manifesta divinitas".
(n) ‹avaritiae morbus› · printed under col 270
Prima editio, inducit. Postea, scllicet deest in aliquot mss.
The first edition [reads] "inducit". Afterwards, "scilicet" is lacking in some manuscripts.
(o) ‹ad aeternitatem› · printed under col 270
Exemplar Pauli Diac., nutriant.
The copy of Paul the Deacon [reads] "nutriant".
(p) ‹et desolatarum› · printed under col 270
Ita apud Quesn. et in mss. S. Petri. Al., lamenta. Paulo post in uno cod. S. Petri, non aliquam habere possit, pro non aliquam possit exsequi.
So in Quesnel and in the manuscripts of St Peter's. Others [read] "lamenta". A little later, in one codex of St Peter's, "non aliquam habere possit", for "non aliquam possit exsequi".
(q) ‹rei familiaris modo› · printed under col 270
Lectionem editorum ante Quesn. auctoritate praestantiorum codicum revocavimus. Solum prima editio praefert, ac pietatis. Quesnellus, mensura pendet pietatis; et paulo aliter ms. Venetus, pendet mensura pietatis.
We have restored the reading of the editors before Quesnel on the authority of the better codices. Only the first edition offers "ac pietatis". Quesnel [reads] "mensura pendet pietatis"; and, a little differently, the Venice manuscript "pendet mensura pietatis".
(a) ‹minora mediocrum; sed› · printed under col 271 (the call is printed "(n)" in the text)
Duo mss. S. Petri, non distat. Dein pro idem est, exemplar Pauli Diac., non dissidet, unus Vat., non deest.
Two manuscripts of St Peter's [read] "non distat". Then, for "idem est", the copy of Paul the Deacon [reads] "non dissidet", one Vatican [manuscript] "non deest".
(b) ‹sunt et aliarum› · printed under col 271
Editi ante Quesn., insignia opera coronarum; unus Vat. et Padiliron., insignia virtutum.
The editions before Quesnel [read] "insignia opera coronarum"; one Vatican [manuscript] and the Padolirone, "insignia virtutum".
(c) ‹Quod et› · printed under col 271, running on to col 272
Licet Romanae Urbis sit in duobus codd. S. Petri, iisque concinat in voce Urbis cod. Venetus, expungere tamen noluimus lectionem vulgatam, quam praeferunt ms. Casin. collect. 1, et codd. trium posteriorum collect. 3, 4 et 5; nam Romani quidem orbis, non autem Romanae Urbis imperatores appellari solent. Codex etiam Venetus cum habeat, Romani, Urbis pro Orbis perperam scriptum indicat. Mss. collect. 2 aliter habent; Quod et Romana Urbs et piissimi imperatores... custodiunt. At sequens contextus solis imperatoribus convenit, Dein mss. Ven., Casin. collect. 1 et alii collect. 2, sancta dudum instituta custodiunt; ubi cum accusativus antecedens quod alium accusativum sancta instituta respuat, in cod. Casin. posteriori manu emendatum fuit, institutione; cui lectioni affinis est alia vulgata, et nonnullorum codd., sancta antiquitus observatione custodiunt. Lectionem vero duorum codd. S. Petri uti meliorem textui inseruimus; ex quibus etiam deinde scripsimus, in honorem Dominicae Passionis et Resurrectionis. In editis ante Quesn. deerat, et Resurrectionis; apud hunc vero, in honorem Passionis et Resurrectionis Christi, sicut et in ms. Veneto reperimus.
Although "Romanae Urbis" stands in two codices of St Peter's, and the Venice codex agrees with them in the word "Urbis", we were nevertheless unwilling to strike out the common reading, which the Monte Cassino manuscript of collection 1 offers, and the codices of the three later collections 3, 4 and 5; for the emperors are usually called emperors of the Roman world, but not of the Roman City. The Venice codex too, since it has "Romani", shows that "Urbis" was wrongly written for "Orbis". The manuscripts of collection 2 have it otherwise: "Quod et Romana Urbs et piissimi imperatores ... custodiunt". But the following context suits the emperors alone. Then the Venice manuscript, the Monte Cassino one of collection 1 and others of collection 2 [read] "sancta dudum instituta custodiunt"; where, since the preceding accusative "quod" rejects another accusative, "sancta instituta", in the Monte Cassino codex it was corrected by a later hand to "institutione"; akin to this reading is the other common one, also that of some codices, "sancta antiquitus observatione custodiunt". But we have put the reading of two codices of St Peter's into the text as the better; from them we also then wrote "in honorem Dominicae Passionis et Resurrectionis". In the editions before Quesnel "et Resurrectionis" was lacking; in him, however, [there is] "in honorem Passionis et Resurrectionis Christi", as we also found in the Venice manuscript.
(d) ‹multarum culparum reos› · printed under col 272
Editiones cum quibusdam codd., praecipiunt relaxari. Duo Lectionaria S. Petri non deserenda credidimus. Confer hac de re observationem in serm. 45, inter observationes post appendicem subjiciendas.
The editions, with certain codices, [read] "praecipiunt relaxari". We believed that the two Lectionaries of St Peter's should not be abandoned. Compare on this matter the observation on Sermon 45, among the observations to be placed after the appendix.
(e) ‹miseratione divina,› · printed under col 272
In iisdem S. Petri mss, et in Veneto, etiam ipsorum sit honoranda clementia. Imitentur ergo. Vulgata lectio, quae est etiam quamplurium codicum, sequentibus magis congruit.
In the same manuscripts of St Peter's, and in the Venice one, [the reading is] "etiam ipsorum sit honoranda clementia. Imitentur ergo". The common reading, which is also that of very many codices, agrees better with what follows.
(f) ‹divinam atque humanam› · printed under col 272
Si ex mss, S. Petri. Quesnellus, miserationem, quod in ms. Vat. collect. 5 reperire licuit. Caeteri editi et aliquot codd., benignitatem; unus Vat,, clementiam.
So from the manuscripts of St Peter's. Quesnel [reads] "miserationem", which it was possible to find in a Vatican manuscript of collection 5. The other editions and some codices [read] "benignitatem"; one Vatican, "clementiam".