PL 54 · cols. 447–452
Leo the Great, Sermons
Sermons XC–XCI
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 447–452
Sermons XC–XCI
(a) ‹jejunii nostri› · printed under col 447
Ita cum nostris codd. et vulgatis ante Quesnellum, apud quem nullo nostro ms. suffragante, sacrificium placatus accipiat. Clausulam ex codice Veneto expressimus. Al., Per Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen.
So with our mss. and the printed editions before Quesnel, in whom, with none of our mss. supporting it, [we read] sacrificium placatus accipiat. We have given the closing clause from the Venice ms. Others, Through Christ our Lord. Amen.
(b) ‹ut quod fuit› · printed under col 447
Septimi mensis jejunium apud Hebraeos agebatur ipso expiationis die.
Among the Hebrews the fast of the seventh month was kept on the very Day of Atonement.
(c) ‹ante Judaicum, vestra› · printed under col 447
Ita cum Lectionar. Veneto editiones anteriores Rainaudo et Quesnello, apud quos, sit. Mox tempori pro tempore in ms. Vat. collect. 5.
So, with the Venice Lectionary, the editions earlier than Rainaud and Quesnel, in whom [we read] sit. Shortly after, tempori for tempore in the Vatican ms. of collection 5.
(d) ‹per castigationem› · printed under col 447
Addidimus et ex laudato ms. Veneto.
We have added et from the Venice ms. already cited.
(e) ‹Habet enim hoc in se› · printed under col 447
Editi pro vitium habebant generaliter. Emendationem suppeditavit laudatus cod. Venetus.
The printed editions had generaliter for vitium. The Venice ms. already cited supplied the correction.
(f) ‹et in posteros› · printed under col 448
Sic cum Quesnello idem ms. Venetus et Vat. collect. 5. Al., generali.
So, with Quesnel, the same Venice ms. and the Vatican one of collection 5. Others, generali.
(g) ‹Hinc interior homo,› · printed under col 448
Vulg. ante Quesn. et plures codd., si tamen.
The printed editions before Quesnel and several mss., si tamen.
(h) ‹ut etiam› · printed under col 448
Addidimus illa ex ms. Veneto. Mox alligent pro illigent in prima editione.
We have added illa from the Venice ms. Shortly after, alligent for illigent in the first edition.
(i) ‹judex animus› · printed under col 448
Vulg., suis exterioribus praesit. Praetulimus lectionem cod. Ven.
The printed editions, suis exterioribus praesit. We have preferred the reading of the Venice ms.
(j) ‹indiscreta tristitia: nihil› · printed under col 448
Ita melius ex prima editione, uti etiam indicavit corrigendum Latinus Latinius. Al., in hominem.
So, better, from the first edition, as Latino Latini also indicated it should be corrected. Others, in hominem.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Poenitentiam semper esse necessariam propter continuas inimici insidias et concupiscentiam carnis. — II. Omnia impossibilia ex imbecillitate humana, esse possibilia ex virtute divina. — III. De amore Dei et mundi. — IV. Amorem Dei bonis operibus nutriri. Cur septimi mensis jejunium.
SYNOPSIS. — I. That penance is always necessary because of the continual snares of the enemy and the concupiscence of the flesh. — II. That all things impossible through human weakness are possible through divine power. — III. On the love of God and of the world. — IV. That the love of God is nourished by good works. Why there is a fast of the seventh month.
(f), (g), (h), (i), (j) printed under col 448 but called in col 447, set in n447
(k) ‹esse non potest,› · printed under col 448
De hoc texiu apud Quesnellianos celebri, et de Quesnelli postilla eidem apposita, plura in observationibus ad hunc sermonem dicenda erunt.
About this text, famous among the Quesnellists, and about Quesnel's gloss attached to it, more will have to be said in the observations on this sermon.
(a) ‹quam ut Deus› · printed under col 449
Editi, quem. Melius ex cod. Veneto, quos, unde postea, homines.
The printed editions, quem. Better from the Venice codex, quos, whence afterwards, homines.
(b) ‹quia necesse est ut› · printed under col 449
Al., rectis.
Others, rectis.
(c) ‹instrumenta virtutum› · printed under col 449, running on under col 450
In antiquissimo Vat. 3836 finis hujus sermonis multo diversus profertur sic: Sed quia insidiae diaboli etiam inter talia studia non quiescunt, hoc quod de propheta voce cantatum est, in affectum assumatur orantium, ut non solum labiis, sed et corde dicatur: Custodi me, Domine, ut pupillam oculi, sub umbra alarum tuarum protege me (Ps. XVI, 8). Incessabiliter enim divino egemus auxilio, et haec est humanae devotionis insuperabilis fortitudo, ut illum protectorem semper habeamus, sine quo fortes esse non possumus. Quod ergo et sanctificationi corporum et reparationi prosit animarum quarta et sexta sabbati jejunemus; sabbato vero etiam vigilias celebremus apud beatissimum apostolum Petrum, ut piarum ovium deprecationibus gloriosissimi pastoris patrocinetur oratio. Per Dominum nostrum regnantem cum Patre, et cum Spiritu sancto in saecula saeculorum. Amen. Licet hujus Romani Lectionarii auctoritas, et stylus hunc finem Leoni tribuendum suadet, vulgatam nihilominus lectionem, quae Leonem pariter spirat, et legitur in caeteris codicibus atque in Lectionario Veneto, noluimus deserere. Cum vero tanta varietas Leonis stylum referens, amanuensibus tribui nequeat, id unum hinc colligi posse videtur S. pontificem hunc sermonem bis recitasse, sole fine mutato. Aliquid enim simile aliis in sermonibus, qui alias insignes mutationes praestantissimis Lectionariis mss. probatas exhibent, accedisse probabilissimum est. Confer. serm. 22, in quo Lectionarium Vercellense et Homiliarium Pauli Diaconi non exiguam ab editis aliisque codicibus varietatem praeferunt, uti ibidem observavimus annot. 1. Ita etiam serm. 59, c. 1 et 4, varias et alterius formae lectiones in Vat. 3835 ac in cod. Casinensi deprehendere licuit, quae eamdem causam habere videntur. Post nonnulla editi et posteriores codd., vigoris est nostris reparatio instituta. Magis Leonina visa est syntaxis Lectionarii Veneti.
In the very ancient Vatican 3836 the end of this sermon is given in a much different form, thus: "But because the snares of the devil do not rest even amid such pursuits, let what was sung by the prophet's voice be taken up into the affection of those who pray, so that it is said not only with the lips but also with the heart: Keep me, O Lord, as the apple of the eye; under the shadow of Thy wings protect me (Ps. 16:8). For we need the divine help unceasingly, and this is the invincible strength of human devotion, that we should always have Him as protector without Whom we cannot be strong. So, as it may profit both the sanctification of bodies and the restoration of souls, let us fast on the fourth and sixth day of the week; and on the Sabbath let us also keep vigil at the church of the most blessed apostle Peter, so that the prayer of the most glorious shepherd may support the entreaties of the faithful sheep. Through our Lord, Who reigns with the Father and with the Holy Spirit for ever and ever. Amen." Although the authority of this Roman Lectionary, and the style, urge that this ending be ascribed to Leo, we have nevertheless been unwilling to abandon the common reading, which breathes Leo equally and is read in the other codices and in the Venice Lectionary. But since so great a variation, which reproduces Leo's style, cannot be ascribed to copyists, this one thing seems able to be inferred from it: that the holy pontiff delivered this sermon twice, with only the ending changed. For it is most probable that something similar happened in other sermons, which show other notable changes attested by the most excellent manuscript Lectionaries. Compare sermon 22, in which the Vercelli Lectionary and the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon present no small variation from the printed editions and the other codices, as we observed there in note 1. So too in sermon 59, chapters 1 and 4, it was possible to find variant readings of a different form in Vatican 3835 and in the Monte Cassino codex, which seem to have the same cause. After nonnulla the printed editions and the later codices [read] vigoris est nostris reparatio instituta. The syntax of the Venice Lectionary seemed more Leonine.
(d) ‹Stulte, hac nocte› · printed under col 450
Prima editio, reposcam.
The first edition, reposcam.
(c) continued from col 449, set in n449
(d) call in col 449 (‹Stulte, hac nocte›), printed under col 450, set in n449
(e) ‹nec› · printed under col 450
Legendum forte, inopinatum, non inordinatum, olim conjectaram. At conjectationi modo non parum detraho, tum quod vox ista congruentem huic loco per se significatum habet, tum quod se ipse doctor noster explicat lib. II de Vocat. gentium cap. 21, his aliis verbis idem cogitatum referentibus: Quod ergo ab initio mortale est, qualibet occidat die, non contra legem mortalitatis occumbit, nec umquam ei vicinus est posse vivere, quam posse deficere. Quem enim finem in praesenti sermone inordinatum dicit, illic contra legem mortalitatis appellat. QUESNELLUS. — Putavit Quesnellus in hac annotatione libros de Vocat. gentium esse Leonis, cum tamen alterius incerti auctoris sint, ut alibi demonstrabimus. Omnes tamen nostri codices vulgatam lectionem praeferunt.
I had once conjectured that perhaps inopinatum should be read, not inordinatum. But now I detract not a little from the conjecture, both because that word has of itself a meaning suited to this place, and because our doctor explains himself in book II of the Calling of the Nations, ch. 21, with these other words expressing the same thought: "Therefore what is mortal from the beginning, on whatever day it perishes, does not die against the law of mortality, nor is being able to live ever nearer to it than being able to fail." For the end which in the present sermon he calls inordinatum, he there calls contrary to the law of mortality. QUESNEL. — Quesnel supposed in this note that the books on the Calling of the Nations are Leo's, although they are of another, uncertain author, as we shall show elsewhere. All our codices, however, give the common reading.
(f) ‹esse mortalem› · printed under col 450
Prima editio cum mss. collect. 3 et 4, Quod ergo et. Codices collect. 6, Quod itaque ut. Editiones Quesnello anteriores: Quod itaque ut et sanctificationi. Quesnelli lectionem a nobis receptam codex Venetus confirmat.
The first edition, with the mss. of collections 3 and 4, Quod ergo et. The codices of collection 6, Quod itaque ut. The editions earlier than Quesnel: Quod itaque ut et sanctificationi. The Venice codex confirms Quesnel's reading, which we have adopted.
(g) ‹sabbato autem› · printed under col 450
Ms. Venet., ad beatissimum; et paulo post, orationibus ipsius adjuvandi.
The Venice ms., ad beatissimum; and a little after, orationibus ipsius adjuvandi.
(h) ‹per Christum Dominum nostrum› · printed under col 450
Sequentia ex eodem codice supplevimus.
We have supplied what follows from the same codex.
(i) ‹ipsa quoque mundi elementa› · printed under col 450
Solus Quesnellus, famulentur.
Quesnel alone, famulentur.
(j) ‹incitari: quoniam› · printed under col 450
Ita ex duobus Lect. mss. Rergom. et Veneto S. Marci. Al., experiendo. Paulo post iidem codd., et cum a licitis.
So from two manuscript Lectionaries, that of Bergamo and the Venetian one of St Mark's. Others, experiendo. A little after, the same codices, et cum a licitis.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Dei voluntatem ex ipsis etiam elementis edoceri, quae et a cibis, et a mundana sapientia abstinere jubet. — II. Tam Nestorii quam Eutychis haeresim esse detestandam. — III. Veritatem carnis in Christo ex sacrificio Eucharistiae et praecepto eleemosynae probari.
SYNOPSIS. — I. That the will of God, which commands abstinence both from foods and from worldly wisdom, is taught even by the elements themselves. — II. That the heresy of Nestorius and that of Eutyches alike are to be abhorred. — III. That the reality of the flesh in Christ is proved from the sacrifice of the Eucharist and the precept of almsgiving.
(a) ‹in diminutione tantum› · printed under col 451
Editi ante Quesn., habetur. Duo memorata Lectionaria ut in textu.
The editions before Quesnel, habetur. The two Lectionaries mentioned [read] as in the text.
(b) ‹habeatur escarum› · printed under col 451
Quesnellus in margine et cod. Bergom., Major enim virtus istius boni... pertinet.
Quesnel in the margin, and the Bergamo codex, Major enim virtus istius boni... pertinet.
(c) ‹veritatis inimici qui› · printed under col 451
Vulgati, inter. Correximus ex prima editione et nostris codicibus.
The printed editions, inter. We have corrected from the first edition and our codices.
(d) ‹dogmatum imperitos› · printed under col 451
Prima editio et cod. Bon., quosdam. Mox cod.. Bergom., pro accrescere, habet adhaerescere.
The first edition and the Bonifatian codex, quosdam. Soon after, the Bergamo codex has adhaerescere for accrescere.
(e) ‹praedicare naturam?› · printed under col 451
Ita cum Quesnello laudatus cod. Venetus. Anteriores editiones cum aliis codd., Quia, et ita etiam in tractatu contra Eutychianos cap. 3, qui in appendice edetur.
So, with Quesnel, the Venice codex cited above. The earlier editions with other codices, Quia; and so also in the treatise against the Eutychians, ch. 3, which will be published in the appendix.
(f) ‹detestans Eutychen› · printed under col 451
Quesnellus, divinis. Praepositionem in ex anterioribus editis et codd. Bergom. et Veneto revocavimus; Eutyches enim, qui Christo non Divinitatem, sed veram humanitatem negavit, non divinis humana vacuasse, sed in divinis vacuasse humana dicendus est. Tractatus etiam contra Eutychianos habet, in divinis.
Quesnel, divinis. We have restored the preposition in from the earlier editions and the Bergamo and Venice codices; for Eutyches, who denied to Christ not the Godhead but true manhood, must be said not to have emptied the human by the divine, but to have emptied the human out into the divine. The treatise against the Eutychians also has in divinis.
(g) ‹Virginis matris› · printed under col 451
Addidimus verbum est ex editionibus quae Quesnellianam praecessere, et ex codd. Bergom. et Veneto. Mox ms. Bergom., nec partu sic humanitatem sibi uniens, ut Deus incommutabiliter non permaneret.
We have added the word est from the editions which preceded Quesnel's, and from the Bergamo and Venice codices. Soon after, the Bergamo ms., nec partu sic humanitatem sibi uniens, ut Deus incommutabiliter non permaneret.
(h) ‹ut jejunia› · printed under col 451
Quesnellus omittit vestra. Aliae editiones, jejunia et eleemosynae vestrae. Praetulimus lectionem cod. Veneti et duorum Vatt. Mox editi ante Quesn., contagione. Nostri codd., contagio.
Quesnel omits vestra. Other editions, jejunia et eleemosynae vestrae. We have preferred the reading of the Venice codex and of two Vatican ones. Soon after, the editions before Quesnel, contagione. Our codices, contagio.
(i) ‹qui ista dependunt› · printed under col 451
Al., quid operentur.
Others, quid operentur.
(j) ‹nihil prorsus› · printed under col 451, running on under col 452
Respicit S. pontifex Eutychianorum errorem, qui veritatem corporis et sanguinis Christi post unitionem Verbi in ipsa urbe Roma negasse traduntur serm. 96, cap. 1, his verbis: Sollicitudinem nostram latere non potuit quosdam Aegyptios praecipue negotiatores ad Urbem venisse, eaque quae Alexandriae sceleste ab haereticis sunt admissa defendere, asserentes solam Deitatis in Christo fuisse naturam, nec carnis humanae, quam sumpsit ex beata Maria Virgine, habuisse penitus veritatem. Id in Eutychis sensum, quem idcirco in divinis humana vacuantem hoc ipso in sermone capite antecedenti prodidit; et clarius in ep. 35, cap. 1: Qui unigenitum Dei Filium sic de utero beatae Virginis praedicat natum, ut humani quidem corporis speciem gesserit, sed humanae carnis veritas Verba unita non fuerit; seu, uti traditur ep. 31, ut quod formam servi gessit, quod nostri similis fuit atque conformis, quaedam nostrae carnis fuerit imago, non veritas. Praemonere igitur et praemunire S. pontifex voluit auditores ne quis forte ex hac zizania per Urbem disseminata de ea veritate veri corporis et sanguinis Christi ambigeret, quam in Eucharistia confitebantur et approbabant, dum Eucharistiam sumpturi ad verba sacerdotis dicentis, Corpus Christi et sanguis Christi, respondebant, Amen. Eodem pariter consilio doctrinam et praxim circa Eucharistiam ad Eutychianum errorem revincendum adhibuit etiam ep. 59, cap. 2: In quo hactenus desidiae tempore jacuere, ut nec auditu discerent, nec lectione cognoscerent, quod in Ecclesia Dei in omnium ore tam consonum est, ut nec ab infantium linguis veritas corporis et sanguinis Christi inter communionis sacramenta taceatur. Frustra autem Calvinistae haec Leonis testimonia deludere nisi, reponunt mentem ejus fuisse non dubitandum de veritate corporis et sanguinis Christi in se, non autem non dubitandum de veritate ejusdem in Eucharistia: nam palam S. pontifex affirmavit: Hoc enim ore sumitur quod fide creditur. Igitur si fide credendum est verum corpus et verus sanguis in Christo, idem verum corpus et verum sanguinem ore sumi non est ambigendum.
The holy pontiff has in view the error of the Eutychians, who are reported in sermon 96, ch. 1, to have denied in the very city of Rome the reality of the body and blood of Christ after the union with the Word, in these words: "It could not escape our solicitude that certain Egyptians, chiefly merchants, have come to the City and are defending the things wickedly committed by the heretics at Alexandria, asserting that there was in Christ only the nature of the Godhead, and that the flesh which He took from the blessed Virgin Mary had no reality at all." That this was Eutyches' meaning, he disclosed in the preceding chapter of this very sermon, where for that reason he calls him one who empties the human out into the divine; and more clearly in letter 35, ch. 1: "who so preaches the only-begotten Son of God to have been born of the womb of the blessed Virgin that He bore the appearance of a human body, but the reality of human flesh was not united to the Word"; or, as is stated in letter 31, "that what bore the form of a servant, what was like us and conformed to us, was a kind of image of our flesh, not its reality." The holy pontiff therefore wished to forewarn and fortify his hearers, lest anyone, from this tare sown through the City, should perhaps doubt that reality of the true body and blood of Christ which they confessed and approved in the Eucharist, when, about to receive the Eucharist, they answered Amen to the words of the priest saying, The body of Christ and the blood of Christ. With the same purpose he also employed the doctrine and practice concerning the Eucharist to refute the Eutychian error in letter 59, ch. 2: "In which they have lain until now in the time of sloth, so that they neither learned by hearing nor came to know by reading what is so harmonious in the mouth of all in the Church of God that not even by the tongues of infants is the reality of the body and blood of Christ passed over in silence among the sacraments of communion." But in vain do the Calvinists, having tried to elude these testimonies of Leo, reply that his meaning was that one must not doubt of the reality of the body and blood of Christ in itself, not, however, that one must not doubt of its reality in the Eucharist: for the holy pontiff openly affirmed: "For that is taken by the mouth which is believed by faith." Therefore if a true body and true blood in Christ is to be believed by faith, there is no doubt that the same true body and true blood is taken by the mouth.
(k) ‹ille circa› · printed under col 452
Cod. Venetus, inopes.
The Venice codex, inopes.
(l) ‹pascere: quoniam› · printed under col 452
Editiones Quesnello anteriores addunt particulam ut, quae tamen in plerisque nostris codicibus deest. Mox uni de fratribus his meis legitur in iisdem editionibus, non tamen in nostro Lectionario Veneto quod lectionem textus a Quesnello inductam confirmat.
The editions earlier than Quesnel add the particle ut, which, however, is lacking in most of our codices. Soon after, uni de fratribus his meis is read in the same editions, but not in our Venice Lectionary, which confirms the reading of the text introduced by Quesnel.