PL 54 · cols. 415–419
Leo the Great, Sermons
Sermons LXXVIII–LXXIX
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 415–419
Sermons LXXVIII–LXXIX
(a) ‹Filio audet› · printed under col 415
Ita antiquiss. Vat, cum duobus aliis Vaticanis et prima editione. Al., negare.
So the very ancient Vatican [manuscript], with two other Vatican ones and the first edition. Others: negare [to deny].
(b) ‹misericordia potestatem, nec› · printed under col 415
Editi cum quibusdam mss., delata reconciliatio. Correximus ex antiquiss. Vat et Veron.
The printed editions, with some manuscripts: delata reconciliatio [reconciliation brought]. We have corrected from the very ancient Vatican and the Verona [manuscripts].
(c) ‹defectus est gloriae.› · printed under col 415
Prima editio: Quae habet Pater, habet et Filius. habet et Spiritus Sanctus.
The first edition: Quae habet Pater, habet et Filius. habet et Spiritus Sanctus [What the Father has, the Son also has; the Holy Spirit also has].
(d) ‹cum Patre et Filio universa› · printed under col 415
Ita ex antiquiss. Vat. Vulgati ante Quesn. cum mss. collect. posteriorum, per infinita saecula saeculorum. Amen. Quesnellus vero, moderantem in saecula. Amen.
So from the very ancient Vatican. The editions current before Quesnel, with the manuscripts of the later collections: per infinita saecula saeculorum. Amen [through infinite ages of ages. Amen]. But Quesnel: moderantem in saecula. Amen [governing for ever. Amen].
(e) ‹SERMO LXXVIII [Al. LXXVI].› (call before the sub-caption De Jejunio Pentecostes I.) · printed under col 415, continued under col 416
Hic titulus praefertur in mss. 2, 3 et 5 collect. In prima editione et mss. 3 collect. hic sermo inscribitur: De Pentecoste sermo IV, eumque sane idem sermonis initium ipso Pentecostes die habitum prodit. In ms. Casinensi collect. 4 sub eodem titulo de Sancto Pentecoste censentur omnes etiam sermones sequentes 2, 3 et 4 de Jejunio Pentecostes; similisque codex exstitit apud Micrologum; quippe de Eccles. observat. cap. 25 S. Leonis Sermonum memorans librum, plures de Pentecoste in diversis annis fecisse tradit. Ex voce autem plures patet in eo ms. Sermonum libro omnes sermones de Jejunio Pentecostes sub titulo de Pentecoste fuisse comprehensos. Caeterum hoc jejunium intra Pentecostes octavam peractum antiqua locutione vocabatur jejunium mensis quarti; uti similiter in antiquissimo Sacramentario e manuscriptis capituli Veronensis edito a P. Josepho Blanchinio ac Leoni attributo, missa hujus jejunii propria (cujus aliquot nedum sententiae, sed etiam verba, cum sententiis et verbis primi hujus sermonis plane conveniunt, ut interius suis in locis annotabimus) profertur sub titulo. In jejunio mensis quarti. Qui titulus pariter servatur in Sacramentario Gelasiano cardinalis Thomasii lib. I, num. 83, nec non in Gregoriano, quod ex duobus antiquis et purioribus mss. Muratorius edidit. Hinc sequentium etiam sermonum titulus (si de Jejunio olim inscripti credantur, et non potius de Pentecoste) hic videtur fuisse: De jejunio mensis quarti, ut alii aliorum Quatuor temporum sermones inscribuntur: De Jejunio mensis septimi, vel decimi. Sine ulla vero auctoritate codicum nihil immutare voluimus.
This title is prefixed in manuscripts of collections 2, 3 and 5. In the first edition and manuscripts of collection 3 this sermon is inscribed: De Pentecoste sermo IV [On Pentecost, sermon 4], and indeed the very beginning of the sermon shows that it was delivered on the day of Pentecost itself. In the Cassino manuscript of collection 4, under the same title de Sancto Pentecoste [On Holy Pentecost], all the following sermons 2, 3 and 4 on the Fast of Pentecost are also reckoned; and a similar codex existed in the hands of Micrologus; for, mentioning the book of St Leo's Sermons in De Eccles. observat. ch. 25, he reports that he delivered several on Pentecost in different years. From the word plures [several] it is clear that in that manuscript book of Sermons all the sermons on the Fast of Pentecost were included under the title de Pentecoste. For the rest, this fast, kept within the octave of Pentecost, was called in the ancient phrase the fast of the fourth month; just as, likewise, in the very ancient Sacramentary edited from the manuscripts of the chapter of Verona by Fr Joseph Bianchini and attributed to Leo, the Mass proper to this fast (of which several not only thoughts but even words agree plainly with the thoughts and words of this first sermon, as we shall note further on in their places) is given under the title In jejunio mensis quarti [On the fast of the fourth month]. This title is likewise kept in the Gelasian Sacramentary of Cardinal Tommasi, bk. 1, no. 83, and also in the Gregorian, which Muratori edited from two ancient and purer manuscripts. Hence the title of the following sermons too (if they are believed to have been inscribed de Jejunio [On the Fast] of old, and not rather de Pentecoste) seems to have been this: De jejunio mensis quarti, as other sermons of the other Ember Days are inscribed: De Jejunio mensis septimi [On the Fast of the seventh month], or decimi [of the tenth]. But without any authority of the codices we have wished to change nothing.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Instituta esse auctore Spiritu sancto jejunia, ut adversus inimicos suos Christiani validius pugnarent. — II. Contra eum qui liber est a carnalibus desideriis, inermem esse diabolum. — III. Post festa institutum esse jejunium, ut, et illorum fructus permaneat, et negligens circa illa plectatur. — IV. Jejunii, cui comes est misericordia, maximam esse vim.
SYNOPSIS. — I. That fasts were instituted with the Holy Spirit as their author, so that Christians might fight more strongly against their enemies. — II. That against him who is free from carnal desires the devil is unarmed. — III. That the fast was instituted after the feasts, so that both their fruit might remain and he who was negligent about them might be chastised. — IV. That the power of fasting, whose companion is mercy, is very great.
(e) continued from col 415, set in n415
(f) ‹sequitur, ut nostis,› · printed under col 416
« Vel haec Leonis verba, inquit in annotatione Quesnellus, transcripsit Ecclesia in collecta quae primo Quadragesimae sabbato legitur, vel jam tunc in usu erat illa collecta in officiis ecclesiasticis, unde haec verba mutuatus sit auctor noster. Ex alterutro colligitur vel quo in pretio sit Leo in Ecclesia, vel quam antiquae sint collectae quibus hodie utitur Ecclesia in divinis Officiis. » Verius S. Leo nonnullarum orationum quae leguntur in divinis officiis auctor fuit, ut patet ex antiquissimo Sacramentario superius memorato; quod si non est omnino S. Leonis, non pauca tamen continere videtur a Leone lucubrata et in usu sacrorum officiorum recepta, ut in admonitione ad idem Sacramentarium tomo II ostendetur. Inter haec est oratio quae nunc legitur in primo Quadragesimae sabbato; at in eo Sacramentario ponitur: In Jejunio mensis quarti, id est in jejunio Pentecostes, ad quod hic quoque sermo pertinet. Oratio autem in eodem Sacramentario est haec: Adesto, Domine, supplicibus tuis, ut hoc solemne jejunium, quod animis corporibusque curandis salubriter institutum est, devoto servitio celebremus.
« Either the Church, says Quesnel in a note, transcribed these words of Leo into the collect which is read on the first Saturday of Lent, or that collect was already then in use in the ecclesiastical offices, whence our author borrowed these words. From either it is gathered either in what esteem Leo is held in the Church, or how ancient are the collects which the Church uses today in the divine Offices. » More truly, St Leo was the author of some prayers which are read in the divine offices, as is clear from the very ancient Sacramentary mentioned above; which, if it is not wholly St Leo's, yet seems to contain not a few things composed by Leo and received into the use of the sacred offices, as will be shown in the admonition to that same Sacramentary in volume II. Among these is the prayer which is now read on the first Saturday of Lent; but in that Sacramentary it is placed under In Jejunio mensis quarti [On the fast of the fourth month], that is, in the fast of Pentecost, to which this sermon also belongs. The prayer in the same Sacramentary is this: Be present, O Lord, to Thy suppliants, that we may celebrate with devout service this solemn fast, which has been wholesomely instituted for the healing of souls and bodies.
(g) ‹Aderat› · printed under col 416
Editi, quippe; sed melius ex Lectionario Veronensi, quidem, ut subsequens contextus ostendit.
The printed editions: quippe [for indeed]; but better, from the Verona Lectionary, quidem [indeed], as the following context shows.
(h) ‹tirocinium› · printed under col 416
In laudato Sacramentario, in alia missa in Jejunio mensis quarti alia oratio ex his verbis derivata cognoscitur: Concede nobis, Domine, praesidia militiae Christianae sanctis inchoare jejuniis, ut contra spiritales nequitias pugnaturi, continentiae muniamur auxiliis. Haec eadem oratio in Gelasianum card. Thomasii codicem traducta legitur lib. I, num. 83. Mox, sanctis inchoavere jejuniis, quod cum recitata oratione magis convenit, scripsimus ex ms. Lectionario Veronensi, pro eo quod legebatur in editis, sanctis jejuniis inchoarunt.
In the Sacramentary cited, in another Mass In Jejunio mensis quarti, another prayer derived from these words is recognized: Grant us, O Lord, to begin the defences of Christian warfare with holy fasts, that, being about to fight against spiritual wickedness, we may be fortified by the aids of continence. This same prayer is found carried over into Cardinal Tommasi's Gelasian codex, bk. 1, no. 83. Just after, sanctis inchoavere jejuniis, which agrees better with the prayer quoted, we have written from the manuscript Verona Lectionary, instead of what was read in the printed editions, sanctis jejuniis inchoarunt.
(i) ‹abstinentiae arma› · printed under col 416
Mss. collect. 3 et 5 atque editiones ante Quesn., raperent. Ms. collect. 4, reciperent.
Manuscripts of collections 3 and 5 and the editions before Quesnel: raperent [might seize]. The manuscript of collection 4: reciperent [might receive].
(a) ‹etiam qui multum› · printed under col 417
Cod. Veronen. et Vat. collect. 5, valdeque.
The Verona codex and the Vatican [codex] of collection 5: valdeque [and greatly].
(b) ‹securus sit, ut› · printed under col 417
Ita ex nostris codd. Al., ab omni.
So from our codices. Others: ab omni [from every].
(c) ‹CAP. III. — Igitur› · printed under col 417
Eadem habet praefatio missae laudatae annotatione 2 in Sacramentario Veronensi: Vere dignum. Post illos enim sanctae laetitiae dies, quos in honorem Domini a mortuis resurgentis, et in coelos ascendentis exegimus; postque perceptum sancti Spiritus donum, necessario nobis haec jejunia sancta provisa sunt; ut pura conversatione viventibus, quae divinitus Ecclesiae collata sunt, permaneant. Per. Tanta hujus missae cum haec sermone concordia eumdem auctorem demonstrare videtur. Haec autem praefatio etiam in Gelasiano Sacramentario legitur.
The preface of the Mass cited in note 2, in the Verona Sacramentary, has the same things: Vere dignum [It is truly meet]. For after those days of holy joy which we have spent in honour of the Lord rising from the dead and ascending into the heavens, and after the gift of the Holy Spirit has been received, these holy fasts have necessarily been provided for us; so that for those who live in pure conduct the things divinely conferred on the Church may remain. Per [Through …]. So great an agreement of this Mass with this sermon seems to show the same author. This preface is also read in the Gelasian Sacramentary.
(d) ‹donum, salubriter et› · printed under col 417
Ms. Veron. salubriter necessaria.
The Verona manuscript: salubriter necessaria [wholesomely necessary].
(e) ‹purificationem, ac› · printed under col 417
Cod. Bon. et prima editio, per misericordiae opera.
Codex Bon. and the first edition: per misericordiae opera [through the works of mercy].
(f) ‹in pretia captivorum,› · printed under col 417
Conjunctionem et a Rainaudo et Quesnello omissam, ex anterioribus editionibus et nostris codd. revocavimus.
The conjunction et, omitted by Raynaud and Quesnel, we have restored from the earlier editions and our codices.
(g) ‹dum quodcumque tribuit› · printed under col 417
Codex Veron omittit, ad subsidium; et post pauca habet, Quoniam ipsis miserebitur Deus.
The Verona codex omits ad subsidium [for relief]; and a little after has Quoniam ipsis miserebitur Deus [because God will have mercy on them].
(h) ‹a spiritalibus inimicis et› · printed under col 417
Prima editio, a corporalibus; et dein hanc sermonis clausulam praefert: Per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum Filium tuum, qui tecum vivit et regnat in unitate Spiritus sancti Deus, per omnia saecula saeculorum. Amen.
The first edition: a corporalibus [from bodily]; and then it gives this close of the sermon: Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, Who lives and reigns with Thee in the unity of the Holy Spirit, God, through all ages of ages. Amen.
(i) ‹SERMO LXXIX [Al. LXXVII].› (call before the sub-caption De Jejunio Pentecostes II.) · printed under col 417
In mss. libris collect. 3, qui superiorem sermonem inscripserunt: De Pentecoste sermo IV, huic titulus praefigitur: De Jejunio Pentecostes sermo I, et ita etiam in tabula primae editionis.
In the manuscript books of collection 3, which inscribed the preceding sermon De Pentecoste sermo IV, this title is prefixed to this one: De Jejunio Pentecostes sermo I [On the Fast of Pentecost, sermon 1], and so also in the table of the first edition.
(j) ‹omnem observantiam› · printed under col 417
Adjectivum Christianam praeteriit Quesnelli editio: revocavimus ex caeteris editionibus, quibus omnes nostri codices, uno excepto, favent.
Quesnel's edition passed over the adjective Christianam: we have restored it from the other editions, which all our codices but one support.
(k) ‹quidquid ab Ecclesia› · printed under col 417
Lectionar. Bergomen., consuetudine.
The Bergamo Lectionary: consuetudine [by custom].
(l) ‹est devotionis receptum,› · printed under col 417, continued under col 418
Haec conformia videntur Augustini doctrinae lib. IV de Baptismo cap. 24: Quod universa tenet Ecclesia, nec Conciliis institutum, sed semper retentum est, non nisi auctoritate apostolica traditum rectissime creditur. Displicet tamen nonnullis quod hanc apostolicae traditionis praerogativam Auctor tribuerit etiam jejunio Quatuor-Temporum, de quo hic agitur, cum hoc jejunium non semper universa Ecclesia servaverit. Sed quod in Romana Ecclesia antiqua observantia custodiebatur, apostolicae institutioni tribuendum communi locutione ac sensu inolevisse videtur; ac propterea. S. Hieronymus in ep. 71, ad Lucinium, n. 6, licet de observantiis quarumdam Ecclesiarum peculiaribus loqueretur, non dubitavit scribere: Unaquaeque provincia abundet in suo sensu, et praecepta majorum leges apostolicas arbitretur. Observavimus praeterea Leonem frequenter jejunia et alia Christianae pietatis opera apostolicae institutioni idcirco tribuere, quod jejunium et alias ejusdem generis observantias apostolica doctrina commendaverit, licet haec vel illa peculiaris jejunii aut alterius pii operis determinatio ab apostolis profecta non fuerit, sed ex apostolica eruditione a Patribus seu majoribus fuerit instituta. Ita collectas quasdam Romanae Ecclesiae proprias, quas prudenter a Patribus et utiliter ordinatas agnoscit serm. 4 de Collectis, c. 3, apostolicae institutioni nihilominus tribuit: quia, inquit serm. 3, beatissimi discipuli veritatis (id est apostoli) hoc divinitus inspirata commendavere doctrina, ut quoties caecitas paganorum superstitionibus suis esset intentior, tunc praecipue populus Dei orationibus et operibus pietatis instaret: occasione autem paganicae superstitionis eas collectas a Patribus institutas tradit. Similiter jejunium quatuor temporum mensis decimi a Patribus sancitum expresse docet S. Pontifex serm. 16, cap. 2, inquiens: Sancti Patres nostri divinitus inspirati decimi mensis sanxere jejunium; cum quibus non aliter conciliari potest apostolica traditio seu institutio, cui idem jejunium passim ab eodem ascribitur, nisi quia, ut ait serm. 81, cap. 1, inter omnia apostolicae instituta doctrinae, quae ex divinae eruditionis fonte manarunt, dubium non est.... hanc primum ab eis observantiam fuisse conceptam, ut sancti observatione jejunii omnium virtutum regulas inchoarent.
These things seem in conformity with the teaching of Augustine, On Baptism bk. 4, ch. 24: What the whole Church holds, and was not instituted by Councils but has always been retained, is most rightly believed to have been handed down only by apostolic authority. Some, however, are displeased that the Author has attributed this prerogative of apostolic tradition even to the Ember fast, which is treated here, since the universal Church did not always keep this fast. But it seems to have become established in common speech and sense that what was kept by ancient observance in the Roman Church should be attributed to apostolic institution; and for that reason St Jerome, in letter 71, to Lucinius, no. 6, although he was speaking of the particular observances of certain Churches, did not hesitate to write: Let each province abound in its own sense, and regard the precepts of the elders as apostolic laws. We have observed, moreover, that Leo frequently attributes fasts and other works of Christian piety to apostolic institution for this reason, that apostolic teaching commended fasting and other observances of the same kind, although this or that determination of a particular fast or of another pious work did not come from the apostles, but was instituted by the Fathers or elders out of apostolic instruction. So certain collects proper to the Roman Church, which in serm. 4 on the Collections, ch. 3, he acknowledges to have been ordained prudently and usefully by the Fathers, he nonetheless attributes to apostolic institution: because, he says in serm. 3, the most blessed disciples of the truth (that is, the apostles) commended this by divinely inspired teaching, that whenever the blindness of the pagans was more intent on its superstitions, then above all the people of God should press on with prayers and works of piety; and he reports that these collections were instituted by the Fathers on the occasion of pagan superstition. Similarly the holy Pontiff expressly teaches in serm. 16, ch. 2, that the Ember fast of the tenth month was sanctioned by the Fathers, saying: Our holy Fathers, divinely inspired, sanctioned the fast of the tenth month; with which the apostolic tradition or institution, to which the same fast is everywhere ascribed by him, cannot be reconciled otherwise than because, as he says in serm. 81, ch. 1, among all the institutions of apostolic teaching which flowed from the fount of divine instruction, there is no doubt .... that this observance was first conceived by them, that by the observance of the holy fast they might begin the rules of all the virtues.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Jejunium Pentecostes, de traditione apostolica et institutione Spiritus sancti. — II. Quod discrimen inter fidelium jejunia et jejunia infidelium. — III. Quale jejunium, quod non a Spiritu sancto procedit, et ex quo gloria quaeritur humana. — IV. Ad Deum referendum esse jejunium, quia omnium desideriorum et operum bonorum auctor est.
SYNOPSIS. — I. The fast of Pentecost [comes] from apostolic tradition and the institution of the Holy Spirit. — II. What the difference is between the fasts of the faithful and the fasts of unbelievers. — III. What sort of fast that is which does not proceed from the Holy Spirit, and from which human glory is sought. — IV. That fasting is to be referred to God, because He is the author of all good desires and works.
(a) ‹apud ipsos paganos sunt quaedam› · printed under col 419
Prima editio et cod. Bon.. nove. male. Indicantur autem jejunia a paganis facta ob vanam gloriam, quae idcirco sub falsitate deceptioni mox deputantur, Ita etiam Pharisaeorum jejunia, quae Auctor serm. 89, cap. 1, otiosa appellavit, ad humanam laudem captandam relata commemorat serm. 92, cap. 2, Mox tres nostri codices, Aliud autem agit.
The first edition and codex Bon.: nove [newly], wrongly. What is indicated are fasts kept by pagans for vainglory, which for that reason are presently assigned to deception under falsehood. So too the fasts of the Pharisees, which the Author called idle in serm. 89, ch. 1, he records in serm. 92, ch. 2, as directed to catching human praise. Just after, three of our codices: Aliud autem agit [but ... does one thing].
(b) ‹apud illos› · printed under col 419
Hujus loci sententia in observationibus illustrabitur.
The sense of this passage will be explained in the observations.
(c) ‹catholicus Christianus› · printed under col 419
Quesnellus, Rainaudi editionem secutus, sanctitatem jejunii sui. Anteriorum editionum et nostrorum codicum lectionem praetulimus, cum praesertim nomen fructus adjectivo steritissimum, quod subjicitur, omnino congruat.
Quesnel, following Raynaud's edition: sanctitatem jejunii sui [the holiness of his fast]. We have preferred the reading of the earlier editions and of our codices, especially since the noun fructus [fruits] agrees perfectly with the adjective sterilissimum [most barren] which follows.
(d) called in col 420, set in n420