PL 54 · cols. 353–360
Leo the Great, Sermons
Sermon LXIII
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 353–360
Sermon LXIII
(a) ‹Omnipotentia enim Filii Dei,› · printed under col 353
In duobus mss. Vat., in Vercell. et in Homil. Pauli Diac. ac prima editione, quae per eamdem.
In two Vatican manuscripts, in the Vercelli manuscript, in the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon and in the first edition: quae per eamdem.
(b) ‹vinceretur, et› · printed under col 353
Item cum Quesn. duo mss. S. Petri et unus Vat. Antea editi cum aliis codd. et Homil. Pauli Diac., per ipsam materiam.
So also, with Quesnel, two manuscripts of St Peter's and one Vatican manuscript. The earlier editions, with other manuscripts and the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon: per ipsam materiam.
ADMONITIO IN TRES SERMONES SEQUENTES.
ADMONITION ON THE THREE SERMONS FOLLOWING.
Post antecedentem sermonem perturbatus erat in editis, sicut et in paucis mss. aliquot subsequentium sermonum ordo, qui propterea a nobis plane immutandus fuit. Antecedenti sermoni subjiciebatur sermo cui initium est, Omnia quidem tempora. Sub finem vero sermonis antecedentis promittitur alius sermo feria quarta habendus, in quo S. Leo ita se locuturum spondet, ut salva fide actionum, quae tempore Dominicae passionis impletae sunt, intelligamus non solum remissionem peccatorum in Christo completam (quod eo sermone statuerat), sed etiam formam justitiae esse propositam; quod in feriam quartam exponendum remittit. De hoc autem nihil in sermone Omnia quidem tempora in editis subjecto; quin in ipso alius pariter sermo feria quarta habendus promittitur, qui a nobis postea indicabitur. At sermone sequenti, Gloria dilectissimi, cap. 1, et promissionis mentionem facit, et addit: Quae Dominica passio omnes nos et redemit, et docuit, ut unde datum est pretium, inde et justitia sumeretur. Et cap. 3: Et sacramentum condidit et exemplum, ut unum apprehenderent renascendo, alterum sequerentur imitando, quae ad propositam justitiae formam referentur. Hic igitur sermo, velut anterioris sermonis portio in quartam sabbati reservata, non erat disjungendus.
After the preceding sermon the order of several of the following sermons had been disturbed in the editions, as also in a few manuscripts, and for that reason it had to be entirely changed by us. To the preceding sermon was subjoined the sermon whose beginning is Omnia quidem tempora. But towards the end of the preceding sermon another sermon is promised, to be delivered on the Wednesday, in which St Leo pledges that he will speak in such a way that, saving the faith of the acts which were fulfilled at the time of the Lord's passion, we may understand not only that the remission of sins was accomplished in Christ (which he had established in that sermon), but also that a pattern of justice was set before us; and this he defers to the Wednesday for exposition. But of this there is nothing in the sermon Omnia quidem tempora, subjoined in the editions; indeed in it another sermon, likewise to be delivered on a Wednesday, is promised, which will be pointed out by us later. But in the following sermon, Gloria dilectissimi, chap. 1, he both mentions the promise and adds: Quae Dominica passio omnes nos et redemit, et docuit, ut unde datum est pretium, inde et justitia sumeretur. And chap. 3: Et sacramentum condidit et exemplum, ut unum apprehenderent renascendo, alterum sequerentur imitando, which relate to the pattern of justice set forth. This sermon, therefore, as a portion of the earlier sermon reserved for the fourth day of the week, was not to be separated from it.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Non sola sua potentia pugnatum esse a Christo, sed ex humilitate nostra, ut justitia servaretur. — II. Quidquid habemus adimpletum, id antiquos habuisse obumbratum; unamque fidem ac spem esse omnium. — III. Inseparabilem esse unionem Christi cum utroque corpore suo, naturali et mystico. — IV. Hoc maxime Christiano enitendum, ut caput suum imitetur. — V. Sola praecepta caeremonialia esse mutata; gratiam autem datam ad moralia. — VI. Christum innumeros sibi filios baptismo parere, in quo mortis et resurrectionis imago elucet. — VII. Omne Christiani meritum, gloriam esse Christi qui quos carne sua pascit, spiritu etiam agit et regit.
SYNOPSIS. — I. That Christ fought not by His own power alone, but from our lowliness, so that justice might be preserved. — II. That whatever we have fulfilled, the ancients had in shadow; and that the faith and hope of all is one. — III. That the union of Christ with both His bodies, the natural and the mystical, is inseparable. — IV. That the Christian must strive above all to imitate his Head. — V. That only the ceremonial precepts were changed; but that grace was given for the moral ones. — VI. That Christ brings forth for Himself innumerable sons by baptism, in which the image of death and resurrection shines out. — VII. That every merit of the Christian is the glory of Christ, Who also moves and rules by His Spirit those whom He feeds with His flesh.
(c) ‹tale iniit cum humana humilitate consortium,› · printed under col 353
In cod. Vercell., per susceptam nostrae carnis animaeque substantiam.
In the Vercelli manuscript: per susceptam nostrae carnis animaeque substantiam.
(d) ‹nostra augendo, non propria› · printed under col 353, continued under col 354
Idem Vercell. cod. addit, relinquendo; male, ut liquet ex consequentibus, quia infirmitas erat provehenda, non virtus, quae ad augmentum quidem nostrae humanitatis affirmandum, divinitatis autem propriae inficiandum referuntur. Mox idem ms. cum prima editione et Homil. Pauli Diac., cum suo Creatore, perperam.
The same Vercelli manuscript adds relinquendo; wrongly, as is clear from what follows, quia infirmitas erat provehenda, non virtus, which relate to affirming the increase of our humanity, but to denying [an increase] of His own divinity. Shortly after, the same manuscript, with the first edition and the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon, has cum suo Creatore, wrongly.
(e) ‹sanctorum, qui› · printed under col 354
Homiliar. Pauli Diac., ab initio mundi.
The Homiliary of Paul the Deacon: ab initio mundi.
(f) ‹et ad eamdem› · printed under col 354
Ita, praeter Homil. Pauli Diac., omnes nostri codices et editi ante Quesnellum, qui spem et fidem nulla auctoritate indicata supposuit.
So, apart from the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon, all our manuscripts and the editions before Quesnel, who substituted spem et fidem without indicating any authority.
(g) ‹vel patres nostri› · printed under col 354
Editi, adoptavere. Quesnellus in margine, sed prima editio, adoravere.
The editions: adoptavere. Quesnel in the margin, but the first edition: adoravere.
(h) ‹atque gentiles ulla› · printed under col 354
Apud Quesnellum, distantia est, repugnantibus omnibus editis nostrisque mss. ac Homiliario Pauli Diac. Pauli etiam textus habet, distinctio.
In Quesnel: distantia est, against all the editions and our manuscripts and the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon. The text of Paul [the Apostle] also has distinctio.
Post hunc dubimus sermonem, Omnia quidem tempora, die Dominico habitum contra Eutychianos; in cujus fine cum alius sermo eadem super re feria quarta adjiciendus dicatur, nec statim subjectus inveniretur in editis, nos subjecimus. Deprehendimus autem hunc sermonem esse illum qui incipit: Sermonem, dilectissimi, de gloriosa Domini nostri Jesu Christi passione promissum; ubi S. pontifex in Eutychis errorem pariter disserit. Enimvero hos duos sermones ob continuationem velut unum habendos, patet ex epist. 124 et 165, in quibus postquam S. Leo duo fere integra postrema capita 3 et 4 descripsit ex sermone, qui incipit: Omnia quidem tempora, continuo subjicit fragmentum primi capitis ex alio sermone, qui inchoat: Sermonem, dilectissimi; unde alter alterius est portio. Haec omnia confirmat ordo qui invenitur in duobus antiquis mss. Lectionariis basilicae S. Petri, num. 105 et 107, ubi inter sermones de Passione post sermonem, Desiderata nobis, subditur: Gloria, dilectissimi; dein: Omnia quidem tempora; ac postea Sermonem, dilectissimi, de gloriosa, etc. Idem etiam ordo exhibetur in tribus aliis codicibus praestantis collect. 2.
After this we have given the sermon Omnia quidem tempora, delivered on a Sunday against the Eutychians; and since at its end another sermon on the same subject is said to be going to be added on the Wednesday, and none was found subjoined immediately in the editions, we have subjoined it. We have found that this sermon is the one which begins: Sermonem, dilectissimi, de gloriosa Domini nostri Jesu Christi passione promissum; where the holy pontiff likewise discourses on the error of Eutyches. That these two sermons are indeed to be held as one because of their continuity is plain from letters 124 and 165, in which St Leo, after copying out almost entire the last two chapters, 3 and 4, from the sermon which begins Omnia quidem tempora, immediately subjoins a fragment of the first chapter from the other sermon, which begins Sermonem, dilectissimi; hence the one is a portion of the other. All this is confirmed by the order found in two ancient manuscript Lectionaries of the basilica of St Peter, nos. 105 and 107, where among the sermons on the Passion, after the sermon Desiderata nobis, there is subjoined Gloria, dilectissimi; then Omnia quidem tempora; and afterwards Sermonem, dilectissimi, de gloriosa, etc. The same order is also shown in three other manuscripts of the excellent second collection.
(a) ‹neque femina› · printed under col 355
In Homil. Pauli Diac., Omnes enim vos unum estis in Christo Jesu, ut in Pauli epistola habetur.
In the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon: Omnes enim vos unum estis in Christo Jesu, as it stands in Paul's epistle.
(b) ‹membra dividi› · printed under col 355
Ita cohaerentius antecedentibus ex Homil. Pauli Diac. Al., non possunt.
So, more consistently with what precedes, from the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon. Others: non possunt.
(c) ‹omnem plenitudinem› · printed under col 355
Aliqui mss. et editi ante Quesn. addunt, divinitatis; quam tamen vocem licet a nonnullis Patribus additam, alii Leonis codd. ignorant, sicut etiam non tam in Graeco quam in antiquae versionis exemplaribus desiderari P. Sabatier ostendit.
Some manuscripts and the editions before Quesnel add divinitatis; but this word, although added by some Fathers, the other manuscripts of Leo do not know, just as P. Sabatier has shown that it is lacking not so much in the Greek as in the copies of the ancient version.
(d) ‹carnis peccati› · printed under col 355
Editi ante Quesn. habent, forma fieri; non ita tamen nostri codices.
The editions before Quesnel have forma fieri; but our manuscripts do not.
(e) ‹innocens erat› · printed under col 355
In Homil. Pauli Diac., creatura, male. Potius corrigendum hominum, pro omnium, ut in epistolis 124 et 165, c. 5, habetur, in quo solo homo se invenit innocentem.
In the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon: creatura, wrongly. Rather hominum should be read for omnium, as is found in letters 124 and 165, chap. 5: in quo solo homo se invenit innocentem.
(f) ‹ut peccatis mortui, justitiae› · printed under col 355
In ms. Vercell. et apud Paulum Diac., viveremus.
In the Vercelli manuscript and in Paul the Deacon: viveremus.
(g) ‹et si remota est› · printed under col 355, continued under col 356
Ita Quesnellus cum suis mss. Corb., Vict. Thuan. Reg. et editione Surii ad marginem. Ita etiam plerique et potiores nostri codd. cum Homil. Pauli Diac. Al., justitiae legis.
So Quesnel with his manuscripts of Corbie, St Victor, de Thou, the Royal, and the edition of Surius in the margin. So also most and the better of our manuscripts, with the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon. Others: justitiae legis.
(h) ‹qui novorum,› · printed under col 356
In exempl. Pauli Diac., figurarum tamen et promissionum sacramenta, quod non displicet. Sic etiam in prima editione, quae solum omittit conjunctionem et.
In the copies of Paul the Deacon: figurarum tamen et promissionum sacramenta, which is not displeasing. So also in the first edition, which only omits the conjunction et.
(i) ‹sed etiam› · printed under col 356
Duo codd. S. Petri, in praesentiarum.
Two manuscripts of St Peter's: in praesentiarum.
(j) ‹neque› · printed under col 356
In iisdem codd., ex voluptate carnis.
In the same manuscripts: ex voluptate carnis.
(k) ‹Abrahae totius mundi› · printed under col 356
Quesnellus in margine notavit: Al., benedictione, quod nullibi reperimus. Mox benedicitur pro benedicetur scripsimus ex duobus mss. Vat., Homil. Pauli Diac. et prima editione. Ita etiam in sequentibus praesenti tempore ubique legitur, nascuntur, efficit, implet. Item fit pro sit patriarcha, quod est in Quesnello, ex caeteris editis et aliquot codd. emendavimus.
Quesnel noted in the margin: Others, benedictione, which we find nowhere. Shortly after, we have written benedicitur for benedicetur from two Vatican manuscripts, the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon and the first edition. So also in what follows the present tense is read throughout: nascuntur, efficit, implet. Likewise we have corrected to fit, in place of sit patriarcha, which is in Quesnel, from the other editions and some manuscripts.
(l) ‹et› · printed under col 356
In Homil. Pauli Diac., fiet unus grex. Cod Vercell. et prima editio, fiet unum ovile.
In the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon: fiet unus grex. The Vercelli manuscript and the first edition: fiet unum ovile.
(a) ‹pro ovibus suis animam› · printed under col 357
Vox suam, quam supplevit Quesnellus, in nostris mss. legitur.
The word suam, which Quesnel supplied, is read in our manuscripts.
(b) ‹occumbere. Ipse est› · printed under col 357
Editi addunt, enim. Expunximus autem auctoritate ms. Vercell. et Homil. Pauli Diaconi: nam continuatur figura repetitionis, Ipse est.
The editions add enim. But we have struck it out on the authority of the Vercelli manuscript and the Homiliary of Paul the Deacon: for the figure of repetition, Ipse est, is continued.
(c) ‹sed corpus regenerati› · printed under col 357
Exemplum Pauli Diac., fiat corpus. Simili autem sententia auctor epist. ad Demetriadem, c. 1, id baptismati tribuit: In corpus Christi convertitur caro peccati.
The copy of Paul the Deacon: fiat corpus. With a similar thought the author of the letter to Demetrias, chap. 1, attributes this to baptism: In corpus Christi convertitur caro peccati.
(d) ‹(I Cor. XII, 6): ut› · printed under col 357
Supplevimus praepositionem in ex ms. Vercell. et alio Vat. ac prima editione.
We have supplied the preposition in from the Vercelli manuscript and another Vatican manuscript and the first edition.
(e) ‹exstinguit. Hoc est› · printed under col 357
Ita cum Quesnello tres nostri codd. et exemplar Pauli Diac. Anteriores vulgati, quod, male; melius in prima editione et in ms. Bon., per quod.
So, with Quesnel, three of our manuscripts and the copy of Paul the Deacon. The earlier printed editions: quod, wrongly; better, in the first edition and in the Bon. manuscript: per quod.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Attente contemplandam esse Domini passionem, cujus fides ex fide pendet incarnationis. — II. Cur filius, qui aequalis est Patri, et solus sine peccato, sit incarnatus, et non alia persona? — III. Quanti sint pretii mors et sacrificium Christi in Cruce? — IV. Utramque naturam suas in Christo proprietates servantem, suas partes habere in mysteriis diversas.
SYNOPSIS. — I. That the Lord's passion must be contemplated attentively, faith in which depends on faith in the incarnation. — II. Why the Son, Who is equal to the Father and alone without sin, was incarnate, and not another person? — III. Of how great value are the death and sacrifice of Christ on the Cross? — IV. That each nature, keeping its own properties in Christ, has its own distinct parts in the mysteries.
(f) ‹non tam mundi reconciliatio› · printed under col 358
Duo codd. S. Petri, quam et humanae.
Two manuscripts of St Peter's: quam et humanae.
(g) ‹nullatenus recedentes,› · printed under col 358
Ita ex probatioribus nostris codd. et editionibus, excepta Quesnelliana, in qua, illorum.
So from the more approved of our manuscripts and the editions, except Quesnel's, in which: illorum.
(h) ‹quoniam in illis› · printed under col 358
Verba et nos a Quesnello expuncta, licet in codd. collect. 4 omissa, ex plerisque tamen et potioribus nostris codd. ac caeteris editis revocavimus.
The words et nos, struck out by Quesnel, although omitted in the manuscripts of the fourth collection, we have nevertheless restored from most and the better of our manuscripts and the other editions.
Synopsis of Sermo LXIV continued from col 357, set in n357
(a) ‹sed alienus a crimine› · printed under col 359
Lineis inclusa desunt in ms. Corb. Quesnelli.
The words enclosed in the lines are lacking in Quesnel's Corbie manuscript.
(b) ‹Cap. III. —› · printed under col 359
Eadem in ep. 124, al. 97, c. 3; et 165, al. 134, c. 2.
The same in letter 124, otherwise 97, chap. 3; and 165, otherwise 134, chap. 2.
(c) ‹quo sacrificio reconciliati,› · printed under col 359
In epistolis 124, c. 4, et 165, c. 5, hic additur per repetitionem, dicant.
In letters 124, chap. 4, and 165, chap. 5, dicant is added here by repetition.
(d) ‹nec alterius quisquam debitum› · printed under col 359
Ita cum Quesnello duo mss. S. Petri, necnon in duabus superiori annotatione memoratis epistolis. Caeterae editiones cum codd. collect. posteriorum, suo funere solvit. Mox solus sine voce unus erat in editis et aliquibus mss. Unus autem absque voce solus habetur in duobus codd. S. Petri. Ex laudatis vero epistolis utrumque nomen copulavimus. Dein in quibusdam codd. post vocem Jesus additur Chaistus.
So, with Quesnel, two manuscripts of St Peter's, and also the two letters mentioned in the note above. The other editions, with the manuscripts of the later collections: suo funere solvit. Shortly after, solus without the word unus stood in the editions and some manuscripts. But unus without the word solus is found in two manuscripts of St Peter's. From the letters cited we have joined both words. Then in certain manuscripts Christus is added after the word Jesus.
(e) ‹omnes etiam› · printed under col 359
In duabus laudatis epistolis, sunt. At aliqui codd. in ep. 165 praeferunt, sint.
In the two letters cited: sunt. But some manuscripts in letter 165 show sint.
(f) ‹Cum exaltatus fuero› · printed under col 359
Eaedem epistolae addunt, a terra; at desunt hae voces etiam in serm. 66, c. 5.
The same letters add a terra; but these words are lacking also in sermon 66, chap. 5.
(g) ‹et creans justos› · printed under col 359
In iisdem epistolis clarius explicatum fuit, ad humanitatis suae tracta participem.
In the same letters it was explained more clearly: ad humanitatis suae tracta participem.
(h) ‹in illo acquirit salutem,› · printed under col 359, continued under col 360
Corruptissima erat et in editis et in mss. haec periodus, ac plane sensu carens; nam ubique deerat nomen, homo, quod regit sequentia verba invenit, et pervenit; et ad augendam difficultatem post vocem innocentem affixo in editis puncto una periodus divisa fuerat in duas, secunda inchoante: Et quia unus est mediator, etc. Etsi autem mss. hoc loco nihil juverint, tute nihilominus emendavimus et supplevimus ex duabus nuper allegatis epistolis. Quamquam vero in his omittantur verba, et quia unus usque deitatis (nam S. pontifex aliqua ex suis sermonibus ita solet sumere, ut quaedam praetereat vel transiliat), cum tamen in iisdem epistolis post voces homo se invenit innocentem, statim subjiciantur illa, liberum habens, quae ad nomen homo palam referuntur, reliquam emendationem satis exinde collegimus. Praeterea vocibus in quo ex iisdem epistolis addidimus solo, uti etiam sermone antecedenti, c. 4, in quo solo inncens erat natura omnium.
This sentence was most corrupt both in the editions and in the manuscripts, and plainly without sense; for everywhere the noun homo was lacking, which governs the following verbs invenit and pervenit; and, to increase the difficulty, by a full stop placed in the editions after the word innocentem one sentence had been divided into two, the second beginning: Et quia unus est mediator, etc. But although the manuscripts gave no help at this place, we have nevertheless safely emended and supplied it from the two letters just cited. And although in these the words from et quia unus as far as deitatis are omitted (for the holy pontiff is accustomed to take some things from his sermons in such a way as to pass over or skip certain parts), yet since in the same letters, after the words homo se invenit innocentem, there immediately follow the words liberum habens, which plainly refer to the noun homo, we have gathered the rest of the emendation sufficiently from there. Moreover, to the words in quo we have added solo from the same letters, as also in the preceding sermon, chap. 4: in quo solo innocens erat natura omnium.
(i) ‹liberum habens› · printed under col 360
In laudatis epistolis additur, per gratiam Dei. Postea, humilitate, pro infirmitate, praeferunt eaedem epistolae.
In the letters cited per gratiam Dei is added. Afterwards the same letters show humilitate for infirmitate.
(j) ‹carnis una persona sit,› · printed under col 360
Editi addunt, non una substantia. Desunt in mss. Quesn. et nostris. Desiderantur etiam in epistolis laudatis; sed in epist. 165, c. 5, immutatur subsequens lectio hoc modo: una persona sit quae inseparabiliter atque indivise communes habeat actiones.
The editions add non una substantia. These words are lacking in Quesnel's manuscripts and in ours. They are also missing in the letters cited; but in letter 165, chap. 5, the following reading is altered in this way: una persona sit quae inseparabiliter atque indivise communes habeat actiones.
(k) ‹quem Herodes cupiebat› · printed under col 360
Sic ex cod. Bonon. ac prima editione reposuimus, cum Leoninam rationem praeferant antea transferri, et hic, occidi. Al., occidere. In epistolis laudatis etsi hujus loci verba aliquantulum immutentur, passive tamen utrobique habetur: Non juberetur transferri in Aegyptum puer, et ab Herodis persecutione subduci.
Thus we have restored it from the Bologna manuscript and the first edition, since the earlier transferri and, here, occidi show Leo's manner. Others: occidere. In the letters cited, although the words of this passage are somewhat altered, yet the passive is found in both places: Non juberetur transferri in Aegyptum puer, et ab Herodis persecutione subduci.