PL 54 · cols. 257–262
Leo the Great, Sermons
Sermons XXXVII–XXXVIII
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 257–262
Sermons XXXVII–XXXVIII
(a) ‹si quae veneramur› · printed under col 257
Unus ms. Vat. et alius Bon. ac prima editio, condita.
One Vatican ms. and another of Bologna, and the first edition: "condita" [founded].
(b) ‹nascendo suscepit,› · printed under col 257
Tres mss. Vat. et prima editio, ad profectum.
Three Vatican mss. and the first edition: "ad profectum".
(c) ‹loquuntur auctorem.› · printed under col 257
Sic cum Quesnello et prima editione omnes nostri codices. Al., Puer corpore parvus, mundi Rector et Dominus.
So all our codices, with Quesnel and the first edition. Others: "The Child small in body, Ruler and Lord of the world".
(d) ‹Nec immerito› · printed under col 257
Tres mss. Vat. addunt, quia.
Three Vatican mss. add "quia" [because].
(e) ‹aut mutis eloquium reformantem,› · printed under col 257
Nec, pro vel, quod erat in vulgatioribus editis et aliquibus mss. substituimus ex duobus codd. S. Petri et prima editione.
"Nec", in place of "vel", which stood in the more common editions and in some mss., we have substituted from two codices of St Peter's and the first edition.
(f) ‹in quo nullum› · printed under col 257
In editis, apparet et praebetur. Emendavimus ex prima editione et duobus codd. S. Petri ac uno Bonon., cum praesertim hanc lectionem ipse contextus efflagitet.
In the printed editions: "apparet" and "praebetur". We have corrected from the first edition and two codices of St Peter's and one of Bologna, especially since the context itself demands this reading.
(g) ‹praedicationem auribus intimandam,› · printed under col 257, last word under col 258
In excusis ante Quesn. et in uno Vat., oculisque gerebat, corrupte. Quesnelli emendationem in caeteris nostris codd. et in prima editione reperimus. Solum inferebat et ingerebat in uno Vat. et duobus S. Petri. Post verbum ingerebat legebatur in omnibus editis ac plerisque mss., et quod adhuc vocis non proferebat sonus, visionis jam decebat effectus. Quesnellus nihil indicans correxit, ut in ms. S. Petri invenimus.
In the editions printed before Quesnel and in one Vatican ms.: "oculisque gerebat", corruptly. Quesnel's emendation we have found in our other codices and in the first edition. Only "inferebat" and "ingerebat" in one Vatican ms. and two of St Peter's. After the word "ingerebat" there was read in all the editions and most mss. "et quod adhuc vocis non proferebat sonus, visionis jam decebat effectus". Quesnel, indicating nothing, corrected it, as we have found in the ms. of St Peter's.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Opere imitari necesse est quod fide creditur. Mysteria Christi, et sacramenta sunt, et exempla.—II. Infantia Christi, quae lex est vivendi, nihil nisi crucem et humilitatem praedicat.—III. Tota Christi fortitudo, humilitas; quae tota sapientiae Christianae disciplina, et cujus infantia est magistra. — IV. In quo sita sit infantia Christiana, ad quam nos Christi infantia invitat.
SYNOPSIS. — I. What is believed by faith must be imitated in deed. The mysteries of Christ are both sacraments and examples. — II. The infancy of Christ, which is the law of living, preaches nothing but the cross and humility. — III. The whole strength of Christ is humility; which is the whole discipline of Christian wisdom, and of which infancy is the teacher. — IV. In what Christian infancy consists, to which the infancy of Christ invites us.
(g) continued from col 257, set in n257 (its last word "nimus." heads the notes of this column)
(h) ‹et mundum,› · printed under col 258
Erat in editis et in nonnullis mss, humilitate est concepta, humilitate est conf⟨ec⟩ta; quae syntaxis a Leone videtur aliena. Correctionem suggesserunt duo mss. S.Petri.aliena.Correctionem suggesserunt duo mss. S.Petri.alius Venetus. Vallicel.et Casin., hoc discrimine, quod unus S. Petri habet concepta pro coepta. Venetus autem, de humilitate. In codice Casanat, prima manu desunt verba, humilitate confecta, quae suppleta fuerunt manu posteriori, eademque manu pro coepta emendatum concepta.
In the editions and in some mss. there stood "humilitate est concepta, humilitate est confecta"; a construction which seems foreign to Leo. The correction was suggested by two mss. of St Peter's [a line printed twice in this printing: "aliena. Correctionem suggesserunt duo mss. S. Petri."], another Venetian, the Vallicelliana and the Monte Cassino [codices], with this difference, that one of St Peter's has "concepta" for "coepta"; the Venetian, however, "de humilitate". In the Casanatense codex the words "humilitate confecta" are lacking in the first hand; they were supplied by a later hand, and by the same hand "coepta" was corrected to "concepta".
(i) ‹unigenitus Dei› · printed under col 258
Vox Filius addita ex mss. S. Petri.
The word "Filius" has been added from the mss. of St Peter's.
(j) ‹discipuli ejus› (note printed with the letter "(l)") · printed under col 258
Editi et nonnulli cod., intra se. Saniorem lectionem suppeditarunt laudati mss. S. Petri et alius Vat.
The editions and some codices: "intra se". The sounder reading was supplied by the aforesaid mss. of St Peter's and another Vatican [ms.].
(k) ‹statuit eum in medio corum,› · printed under col 258
Prima editio, et ait: Amen, amen dico vobis. Dein, sicut parvulus iste, hic major est, in eadem editione et in duobus mss. S. Petri. Unus Vat., sicut puer iste, hic major est.
The first edition: "et ait: Amen, amen dico vobis". Then "sicut parvulus iste, hic major est" in the same edition and in two mss. of St Peter's. One Vatican [ms.]: "sicut puer iste, hic major est".
(l) ‹Amat Christus infantiam,› · printed under col 258
Quam primam, in duobus Vat.
"Quam primam", in two Vatican [mss.].
(m) ‹Amat Christus infantiam,› (the third) · printed under col 258
Quae in editis ante Quesnellum, sicut etiam in ms. Gaudiival, apud eumdem, et in uno nostro Vat. At prima editio cum caeteris codd. ut in textu.
"Quae" in the editions before Quesnel, as also in the Gaudiival ms., in the same [Quesnel], and in one of our Vatican [mss.]. But the first edition with the other codices as in the text.
(a) ‹tam mira› · printed under col 259
Ita cum Quesnello prima editio et codd, S. Petri. Al., confessio.
So, with Quesnel, the first edition and the codices of St Peter's. Others: "confessio".
(b) ‹qua nobis› · printed under col 259
Sic cum Quesn. quatuor nostri codices. Al., imitatione. Postea mss. Bonon. et prima editio, docet . . . et dixit, pro doceat . . . et dicat.
So, with Quesnel, four of our codices. Others: "imitatione". Afterwards the Bologna mss. and the first edition: "docet . . . et dixit" in place of "doceat . . . et dicat".
(c) ‹Non ergo ad› · printed under col 259
In excusis ante Quesn. et in Gaudiival, ejusdem, sicut et in aliquot nostris codd., lubrica. Latinus Latinius in bibliotheca sacra et profana conjecit legendum, ludicra: quam lectionem a Quesnello receptam ms. S. Petri et alio codice approbatam reperimus; sicut idem codices approbant, revertendum est, pro redeundum est, quod et in editis et in aliis mss. occurrit.
In the editions printed before Quesnel and in the Gaudiival [ms.] of the same [Quesnel], as also in some of our codices: "lubrica". Latinus Latinius, in his Bibliotheca sacra et profana, conjectured that "ludicra" should be read: a reading, adopted by Quesnel, which we have found confirmed by the ms. of St Peter's and another codex; just as the same codices confirm "revertendum est" in place of "redeundum est", which occurs both in the editions and in other mss.
(d) ‹graves annos deceat› · printed under col 259
Aliquot editiones cum nonnullis codd., inde sumendum est. Velox ad commotionem transitus. Cod. Casanat collect. 2, inde sumendum est. Velox commotionem transitus; et ita Quesnellus nec non editio Antuerpiensis an. 1683. Tres mss. Vat. collect. 4 et 5, inde sumendus est velox commotionum transitus. Sanior visa est lectio primae editionis et codicis Bon. quam textui inseruimus: in eo scilicet parvuli malitia erimus, si, ut in parvulis accidit, irae commotiones facile transeant, et ad pacem citus sit reditus, et nulla sit memoria offensionis, etc. Cod. Casin. collect. 1 ad hanc lectionem accedit, ubi legitur: Inde sumendum est. Sit velox commotionum transitus Id magis placeret, nisi superflua et durior repetitio verbi est post participia revertendum est, a Leone videretur aliena.
Some editions with several codices: "inde sumendum est. Velox ad commotionem transitus". The Casanatense codex of collection 2: "inde sumendum est. Velox commotionem transitus"; and so Quesnel, and also the Antwerp edition of the year 1683. Three Vatican mss. of collections 4 and 5: "inde sumendus est velox commotionum transitus". Sounder seemed the reading of the first edition and of the Bologna codex, which we have inserted in the text: namely, that we shall be little ones in malice in this, if, as happens with little children, the stirrings of anger pass easily, and the return to peace is quick, and there is no memory of offence, etc. The Monte Cassino codex of collection 1 comes close to this reading, where one reads: "Inde sumendum est. Sit velox commotionum transitus". This would please more, were it not that the superfluous and harsher repetition of the word "est" after the participles "revertendum est" seemed foreign to Leo.
(e) ‹amor sociae› · printed under col 259
Editi, dilectionis Congruentior lectio optimorum codd. S. Petri et unius Vallicel.
The printed editions: "dilectionis". The more fitting reading is that of the excellent codices of St Peter's and of one of the Vallicelliana.
(f) ‹non nosse› · printed under col 260
Editi, et ad maligna. Delevimus ad ope eorumdem mss.
The printed editions: "et ad maligna". We have deleted "ad" with the help of the same mss.
(g) ‹Christianae est› · printed under col 260
Sic omnes nostri codd. et editiones ante Quesnellum, qui nullo ms. indicato scripsit, aequanimitas infantiae. Post pauca, prima editio et ms. Bon., ad hunc nos, et infra, nobis pro vobis.
So all our codices and the editions before Quesnel, who, indicating no ms., wrote "aequanimitas infantiae". A little after, the first edition and the Bologna ms.: "ad hunc nos", and below, "nobis" for "vobis".
(h) ‹ut› (call printed "(b)") · printed under col 260
Duo codd. S. Petri. Intra Bethleem.
Two codices of St Peter's: "Intra Bethleem" [within Bethlehem].
(f), (g), (h) of col 259 are printed at the head of the notes under this column; set in n259
(i) ‹In Epiphaniae solemnitate VIII.› · printed under col 260
Totidem verbis hic sermo legitur inter Augustinianos olim serm. 33 de Tempore, nunc autem in appendice serm. 133, ubi editores Benedictini notant eum esse Leonis papae, ipsique in omnibus mss. attribui. Ex hac appendice aliquot variantes excerpentur.
This sermon is read in as many words among the Augustinian [sermons], formerly as sermon 33 de Tempore, but now in the appendix as sermon 133, where the Benedictine editors note that it is Pope Leo's and is attributed to him in all the mss. From this appendix some variants will be excerpted.
(j) ‹hodiernae saepe› · printed under col 260
Cod. Bon. et prima editio, nobis.
The Bologna codex and the first edition: "nobis".
(k) ‹nihil indignum› · printed under col 260
Sic cum Quesnello et prima editione omnes nosnostri codd., excepto Veronen., qui cum caeteris editis, habeat. Dein, pro transcensis, unus cod. S. Petri, transcursis.
So, with Quesnel and the first edition, all our codices, except the Verona one, which, with the other editions, [has] "habeat". Then, for "transcensis", one codex of St Peter's: "transcursis".
(l) ‹ad sublimiora proficere,› · printed under col 260
Editi omittunt non, quam particulam ex codicibus S. Petri uti congruentiorem adjecimus. Ex eo enim quod anima Christiana nihil indignum debeat de Filii Dei majestate sentire, etc., illud consequi posse videtur, humanae mentis infirmitatem trepidare de ipsa naturae nostrae communione, ac si indigna sit Filio Dei, etc. Leo autem affimat, quamvis primum illud sit verum, non tamen necesse esse hoc secundum. Similiter ex iisdem S. Petri codd. scripsimus, accepit hristus pro eo quod alias legitur, accipit Christum. Codices Venet. et Vallic., accepit Christum. Mox. in cod. Veron. omittitur corporea.
The editions omit "non", a particle which we have added from the codices of St Peter's as more fitting. For from the fact that the Christian soul ought to think nothing unworthy of the majesty of the Son of God, etc., this might seem able to follow: that the weakness of the human mind trembles at the very sharing of our nature, as though it were unworthy of the Son of God, etc. But Leo affirms that, although the first is true, the second is nevertheless not necessary. Likewise from the same codices of St Peter's we have written "accepit [C]hristus" in place of what is read elsewhere, "accipit Christum". The Venetian and Vallicelliana codices: "accepit Christum". Next, in the Verona codex "corporea" is omitted.
SYNOPSIS. — I. Stella gratiam, magi omnes gentes, Herodes paganos, infantes occisi martyres figurant. Omnium est temporum praesens festivitas. — II. Sola fidei luce attingi posse Christi Dei hominisque mysterium, reparando homini necessarium. — III. Gratiae necessitas. Homo bona agens, a Deo habet et effectum operis, et initium voluntatis. Sanctis timendum ne ipsis operibus pietatis elati, deserantur ope gratiae. Quibus signis quisque experiri potest an in ipso Deus habitet? IV. Ex charitate in primis habitatorem cordis Deum cognovimus. Charitati quantum laborandum.
SYNOPSIS. — I. The star figures grace, the magi all the nations, Herod the pagans, the slain infants the martyrs. The present festival belongs to all times. — II. That the mystery of Christ, God and man, necessary for restoring man, can be reached by the light of faith alone. — III. The necessity of grace. Man, doing good, has from God both the effect of the work and the beginning of the will. The saints must fear lest, puffed up by the very works of piety, they be deserted by the help of grace. By what signs can each one test whether God dwells in him? IV. By charity above all we know God as the indweller of the heart. How much we must labour for charity.
(a) ‹lucis refulserit,› · printed under col 261
In append. August., cunctantis fidei moras.
In the Augustinian appendix: "cunctantis fidei moras".
(b) ‹(Philip. ii, 11).› · printed under col 261
Ita nostri codices cum prima editione et append. Aug. Alii editi, quem ut.
So our codices, with the first edition and the Augustinian appendix. Other editions: "quem ut".
(c) ‹humiliter jacentem, ipsum› · printed under col 261
Sic scripsimus ex iisdem codd. et editis ante Quesnellum, qui cum append. Aug. posuit, sine differentia. Cum autem adversus fidei trepidationes sermo sit, sine diffidentia procul dubio praeferendum fuit.
So we have written from the same codices and the editions before Quesnel, who, with the Augustinian appendix, put "sine differentia". But since the discourse is against the tremblings of faith, "sine diffidentia" was beyond doubt to be preferred.
(d) ‹Sic luceat› · printed under col 261
Prima editio et append. Aug. cum quibusdam codd., lux vestra. At alii mss., lumen vestrum, uti habetur etiam serm. 26, c. 4. Dein, glorificent, pro magnificent in ms. Bon. et prima editione.
The first edition and the Augustinian appendix, with some codices: "lux vestra". But other mss.: "lumen vestrum", as is also found in sermon 26, ch. 4. Then "glorificent" for "magnificent" in the Bologna ms. and the first edition.
(e) ‹praesentem intelligat› · printed under col 261
Sic Quesnellus cum append. Aug. et similiter codd. S. Petri. Al., majestatem. Paulo post, Deitatis sex nostri codd. cum prima editione et Quesnelliana nec non append. Aug. Aliae editiones, dignitatis.
So Quesnel with the Augustinian appendix, and likewise the codices of St Peter's. Others: "majestatem". A little after, "Deitatis" six of our codices, with the first edition and Quesnel's, and also the Augustinian appendix. Other editions: "dignitatis".
(f) ‹hominem bona agentem› · printed under col 261
Ita quinque nostri codd. probae notae cum prima editione atque append. Aug. Al., a Deo. Dein, initium bonae voluntatis, in prima editione et ms. Bon.
So five of our codices of good repute, with the first edition and the Augustinian appendix. Others: "a Deo". Then "initium bonae voluntatis" in the first edition and the Bologna ms.
(g) ‹Deus est enim qui operatur› · printed under col 261
Unus cod. Vat. et alius Bon. ac prima editio, in nobis.
One Vatican codex and another of Bologna, and the first edition: "in nobis".
(h) ‹sagaciter quaerat qua humilitate› · printed under col 261
Ms. S. Petri et codd. Veron. ac Padiliron., repugnet.
The ms. of St Peter's and the Verona and Polirone codices: "repugnet".
(i) ‹Ac ne in multis laboret› (note printed with the letter "(l)") · printed under col 261
Potior haec lectio, quae in prima editione et in Antuerpiensi an. 1583 ac in append. Aug nec non in aliquot nostris codicibus invenitur, quam aliarum editionum, solitae. Editores Benedictini aliam insignem variantem in notatione subjiciunt; ms. Navarr. et Corb., Ac ne in multis in vanum laboret, sollicite discretionem inspiciat.
This reading, which is found in the first edition and in the Antwerp one of the year 1583 and in the Augustinian appendix, and also in some of our codices, is better than that of the other editions, "solitae". The Benedictine editors add another notable variant in their annotation; the Navarre and Corbie mss.: "Ac ne in multis in vanum laboret, sollicite discretionem inspiciat".
(j) ‹suae mentis inquirat,› · printed under col 262
Sic Quesnellus cum nostro ms. Padiliron et app. Aug. Caeterae editiones cum aliquot nostris codd, et si in ea dilectionem Dei et proximi toto corde intente repererit. Ms. S. Petri, toto intento corde repererit.
So Quesnel with our Polirone ms. and the Augustinian appendix. The other editions, with some of our codices: "et si in ea dilectionem Dei et proximi toto corde intente repererit". The ms. of St Peter's: "toto intento corde repererit".
(k) ‹Deum et rectorem et› · printed under col 262
Al., inhabitatorem.
Others: "inhabitatorem".
(l) ‹Regnum Dei› · printed under col 262
Cod. Bon. et prima editio, intra nos.
The Bologna codex and the first edition: "intra nos".
(m) ‹(Luc. xvii, 21),› · printed under col 262
Hic locus in codd. et edit. mirifice variat. Prima editio cum codice Victor. Quesnelli et duobus nostris Vat. ac Bon., hi nimirum illius aguntur spiritu. Quesnellus ex ms. Corb. praetulit, non nisi illius aguntur spiritu, quod similiter legitur in append. Aug. Codices Barber., Padiliron. et Venetus, nihilominus illius aguntur spiritu; et paulo aliter in Casinensi, Vallicel, atque Casanatens, nihil non illius aguntur spiritu. Praetulimus lectionem editorum ante Quesn. quippe quae duobus Lectionariis S. Petri e alio Veron. ac ms. Vat. collect. 5 confirmatur, optimamque etiam sententiam reddit, cum nihil non, apud probatissimos scriptores, omnes vel omnia significet.
This passage varies remarkably in the codices and editions. The first edition, with Quesnel's St Victor codex and two of our Vatican [mss.] and the Bologna one: "hi nimirum illius aguntur spiritu". Quesnel preferred, from the Corbie ms., "non nisi illius aguntur spiritu", which is likewise read in the Augustinian appendix. The Barberini, Polirone and Venetian codices: "nihilominus illius aguntur spiritu"; and a little differently in the Monte Cassino, Vallicelliana and Casanatense [codices]: "nihil non illius aguntur spiritu". We have preferred the reading of the editors before Quesnel, since it is confirmed by two Lectionaries of St Peter's, another of Verona, and the Vatican ms. of collection 5, and also gives an excellent sense, since "nihil non", in the most approved writers, signifies "all men" or "all things".
(n) ‹qui operatur omnia› · printed under col 262
Ms. Bon. et prima editio, in nobis.
The Bologna ms. and the first edition: "in nobis".
(o) ‹fidelium corda concurrant› · printed under col 262
Ita nostri decem codd. et editiones ante Quesnellum, qui ex uno ms. Corb. textui inseruit: Transeant a nobis humana, ne nos occupent. Notavit autem lectionem vulgatam reperire in cod. Gaudiival, et pro vana, al. legi ima. In append. Aug., et forte melius: Transeant a nobis vana, et ne nos occupent; constanti, etc.
So ten of our codices and the editions before Quesnel, who from a single Corbie ms. inserted into the text: "Transeant a nobis humana, ne nos occupent". He noted, however, that the common reading is found in the Gaudiival codex, and that for "vana" others read "ima". In the Augustinian appendix, and perhaps better: "Transeant a nobis vana, et ne nos occupent; constanti", etc.