PL 54 · cols. 148–152
Leo the Great, Sermons
Sermon IV
Migne Reading Room
PL 54 · cols. 148–152
Sermon IV
(h) ‹SERMO IV [Al. III].› · printed under col 148 (call stands before the sub-caption De Natali)
In ms. 39 Casinensi, qui post alia aliorum Patrum Opera, duos tantum sermones S. Leonis continet. pag. 588, hic sermo profertur cum titulo: Incipit sermo de Cathedra T. Petri apostoli, quae celebratur VIII. kal. Martii; uti sane tertii nocturni lectiones, quae hac die in Romano Breviario vel hodie leguntur, ex hoc sermone sumptae sunt. In tabula autem Casanatensis ms. inscribitur: In natalitio B. Petri apostoli.
In Monte Cassino manuscript 39, which after other Works of other Fathers contains only two sermons of St Leo, p. 588, this sermon is presented with the title: Here begins the sermon on the Chair of St Peter the Apostle, which is celebrated on the eighth day before the Kalends of March; as indeed the lessons of the third nocturn, which are read on this day in the Roman Breviary even today, are taken from this sermon. In the table of the Casanatensis manuscript, however, it is inscribed: On the birthday of blessed Peter the Apostle.
(i) ‹omnes tamen,› · printed under col 148
Verba, sicut ait Apostolus, a Quesnello omissa, ex omnibus nostris codicibus et anterioribus editionibus revocavimus. Tres codd. Vatt. et editi ante Quesnellum habent: Nos tamen omnes, sicut ait Apostolus, in Christo Jesu unum sumus.
The words sicut ait Apostolus, omitted by Quesnel, we have brought back from all our codices and the earlier editions. Three Vatican codices and the editions before Quesnel have: Nos tamen omnes, sicut ait Apostolus, in Christo Jesu unum sumus.
(j) ‹humilitas portionis,› · printed under col 148
Vat. 3836, In unitatem.
Vat. 3836 [has] In unitatem.
(k) ‹beatissimi Petri apostoli› · printed under col 148
Ita omnes editiones, et codices nostri, inter quos antiquissimus Vaticanus, et laudatus Casinensis, qui duo solum pro secundum illud habent secundum Evangelium. Quesnellus vero expunctis vocibus sacratissima voce dicentis, unius codicis, quem non designat, auctoritate alia substituens, hunc locum sic expressit: Secundum illud beatissimi Petri apostoli, cui iste zermo debet famulari: Et ipsi tanquam lapides, etc.
So all the editions and our codices, among them the very ancient Vatican and the Monte Cassino codex cited, which two alone have secundum Evangelium for secundum illud. Quesnel, however, striking out the words sacratissima voce dicentis and substituting others on the authority of one codex, which he does not name, rendered this passage thus: Secundum illud beatissimi Petri apostoli, cui iste sermo debet famulari: Et ipsi tanquam lapides, etc.
Synopsis. — I. Festivitatem hanc omnibus esse communem Christianis, qui et reges sunt et sacerdotes. — II. Quanta Petro prae caeteris sint collata: Ecclesiam in Petro, et in ejus fide fundatam. — III. Transivit in alios apostolos potestas clavium, quas Petrus accepit. Speciale privilegium Petri, cujus specialis cura a Domino suscipitur, et pro fide cujus proprie Christus oravit, ut firmitas quae per Christum Petro tribuitur, per Petrum apostolis conferatur. — IV. Petri precibus et sollicitudini deberi quidquid boni a successoribus ejus agitur.
Synopsis. — I. This festival is common to all Christians, who are both kings and priests. — II. How much was conferred on Peter before the rest: the Church founded on Peter and on his faith. — III. The power of the keys which Peter received passed to the other apostles. The special privilege of Peter, whose special care is undertaken by the Lord, and for whose faith Christ prayed in particular, so that the firmness which is given to Peter through Christ might be conferred on the apostles through Peter. — IV. Whatever good is done by his successors is owed to the prayers and solicitude of Peter.
(a) ‹signum efficit reges, sancti› · printed under col 149
Particula vero deest in antiquissimo Vaticano, et in Casinensi, qui postremus pro consecrat habet efficit. Post pauca in Vat. laudato deest nostri.
The particle vero is missing in the most ancient Vatican [manuscript] and in the Monte Cassino one, the latter of which has efficit for consecrat. A little after, nostri is missing in the Vatican [manuscript] mentioned.
(b) ‹universi spiritales› · printed under col 149
Sic tres praestantiores nostri codices et prima editio. Reliqui vulgati ante Quesnellum, et alii mss. cum cod. Gaudiival., et rationabiles: quas voces Quesnellus expunxit, et margini apposuit.
So our three better codices and the first edition. The other printed editions before Quesnel, and other manuscripts together with the Gaudiival codex, [read] et rationabiles: which words Quesnel struck out and placed in the margin.
(c) ‹religiosum tamen› · printed under col 149
Ita tres mss. Vaticani et unus Bononiensis cum prima editione; et sane melius, cum S. Leo auditores laudet, qui de provectione seu ordinatione sua tanquam de proprio honore gaudebant. In caeteris editis et in nonnullis codd., nobis; in aliquibus mss. deest tamen.
So three Vatican manuscripts and one of Bologna, with the first edition; and certainly better, since St Leo is praising his hearers, who rejoiced in his advancement or ordination as in their own honour. In the other printed editions and in some codices, nobis; in some manuscripts tamen is missing.
(d) ‹quasi de proprio honore gaudere;› · printed under col 149
Vetustissimus Vaticanus omittit sequentia usque ad finem capitis. Paulo post de effuso in ms. Casinensi.
The most ancient Vatican [manuscript] omits what follows, up to the end of the chapter. A little after, de effuso in the Monte Cassino manuscript.
(e) ‹nihil in quemquam sine› · printed under col 149
Praetulimus lectionem praestantiorem codicum Vatt. et Cas. Aliqui mss. collectionis quartae cum editis pro ipsius habent, illius; alii, ejus.
We have preferred the better reading of the Vatican and Cassino codices. Some manuscripts of the fourth collection, with the printed editions, have illius for ipsius; others, ejus.
(f) ‹participatione transierit.› · printed under col 149
Erat in editis: Verbum enim caro factum fuerat, et habitabat jam in nobis, ut reparando humano generi totum se Christus impenderet. Magis placuit lectio vetustissimi Vaticani et Casinensis, quam etiam confirmant mss. collectionum quartae et quintae quoad postremam partem et reparando,.... impenderat.
The printed editions had: "For the Word had been made flesh, and was already dwelling in us, so that Christ might spend Himself wholly on restoring the human race." The reading of the most ancient Vatican and of the Cassino [manuscript] pleased [us] more, which the manuscripts of the fourth and fifth collections also confirm as to the last part, et reparando …. impenderat.
(g) ‹Famulabantur elementa,› · printed under cols 149–150; the note's letter is not printed: it opens with a guillemet at the foot of col 149 and runs on at the head of the notes under col 150
« Ita omnes editi et codices, excepto Casinensi, qui pro ministrabant habet adorabant. Quesnellus notavit sic legi non solum in editis, sed etiam in mss. Gaudiival. At quo fultus codice hanc lectionem excluserit, et in textu ediderit: Famulabanlur elementa, spiritus angelici serviebant, non docuit.
« So all the printed editions and codices, except the Cassino one, which has adorabant for ministrabant. Quesnel noted that it is read thus not only in the printed editions but also in the Gaudiival manuscripts. But on the support of what codex he excluded this reading and printed in the text Famulabanlur elementa, spiritus angelici serviebant ["the elements served, the angelic spirits did service"], he did not show.
(h) ‹multi sacerdotes sint› · printed under col 150
Quesnellus expunxit voces, multique pastores, quae legebantur in editis, quatuor mss. allegans, qui his verbis carent. Nos vero non tam editorum omnium quam Romanorum et praestantiorum Italiae codicum auctoritate eas voces revocavimus.
Quesnel struck out the words multique pastores, which were read in the printed editions, citing four manuscripts that lack these words. We, however, have restored those words on the authority not so much of all the printed editions as of the Roman and the better Italian codices.
(i) ‹communis est, quamdiu› · printed under col 150
Ita Vaticanus antiquissimus et Casinensis. Alii Vaticani cum editis intelligentiae pro ignorantiae; sed explicatur constanter exhibent. Quesnellus ex quatuor mss. edidit, humanae intelligentiae ambiguitas perstitit; et notavit in Gaudiival. aeque ac in editis legi; explicatur. Si ignorantiae pro intelligentiae reperisset in antiquis codicibus, lectionem nostram facile antetulisset.
So the most ancient Vatican and the Cassino [manuscript]. Other Vatican [manuscripts], with the printed editions, [have] intelligentiae for ignorantiae; but they consistently show explicatur. Quesnel printed from four manuscripts humanae intelligentiae ambiguitas perstitit; and he noted that in the Gaudiival [manuscript], as in the printed editions, explicatur is read. Had he found ignorantiae for intelligentiae in the ancient codices, he would readily have preferred our reading.
(j) ‹qui primus› · printed under col 150
Quesnellus cum mss collectionis quintae, erat. Ex caeteris pluribus et praestantioribus mss. libris est restituimus, quod retinetur etiam in sermone 83, cap, 1, cui hic locus ab ipso Leone insertus fuit.
Quesnel, with the manuscripts of the fifth collection, [has] erat. From the other, more numerous and better manuscript books we have restored est, which is kept also in sermon 83, chap. 1, into which this passage was inserted by Leo himself.
(k) ‹ideo beatus es,› · printed under col 150
Secuti sumus praestantissimos codices Vat. et Casin Vulgati cum aliquot mss. habebant, quia Pater meus te docuit..... sed inspiratio coelestis te instruxit; et non caro et sanguis, etc.
We have followed the most excellent codices, the Vatican and the Cassino. The printed editions, with some manuscripts, had quia Pater meus te docuit ….. sed inspiratio coelestis te instruxit; et non caro et sanguis, etc.
Note (g), called in col 149, runs on at the head of the notes under this column; it is set whole in n149.
(a) ‹in alios apostolos› · printed under col 151
« Ita mss. codd. Hincmarus Remensis opusc. 55, adversus Hincmarum Laudun. c. 20, et in ep. Caroli Calvi nomine ad Adrianum PP. opusc. 43. Et in ep. ad Joannem VIII PP nomine Caroli II imp. et cardin. Jacobatius in tract. de Concilio. In editis legitur vis. » Hactenus Quesnellus. Jus habent etiam Romani codices et Casinensis, quos contulimus. Facile autem fuit legere vis pro jus. In serm. 83, c. 2, quod hinc sumptum fuit, jus pariter legitur.
« So the manuscript codices; Hincmar of Reims, opusc. 55, against Hincmar of Laon, c. 20, and in the letter in the name of Charles the Bald to Pope Adrian, opusc. 43. And in the letter to Pope John VIII in the name of the Emperor Charles II, and Cardinal Jacobazzi in his treatise On the Council. In the printed editions vis is read. » Thus far Quesnel. The Roman codices and the Cassino one, which we have collated, also have jus. And it was easy to read vis for jus. In serm. 83, c. 2, which was taken from here, jus is likewise read.
(b) ‹non frustra uni› · printed under col 151
Vat. 544, commendavit.
Vat. 544, commendavit.
(c) ‹Petri forma› · printed under col 151
Cod. Casinensis, proponitur.
The Cassino codex, proponitur.
(d) ‹praeponitur.› · printed under col 151
Prolixam annotationem Quesnelli huic loco subnexam, in observationibus post Sermones subjiciendis dabimus; eamque ad calculos revocantes, genuinam S. pontificis sententiam ex contextu exponemus. Post pauca pro fertur in antiquissimo Vat. legitur refertur.
Quesnel's lengthy annotation attached to this passage we shall give in the observations to be appended after the Sermons; and, bringing it to account, we shall set out the genuine meaning of the holy pontiff from the context. A little after, for fertur, refertur is read in the most ancient Vatican [manuscript].
(e) ‹turbatura constantiam,› · printed under col 151
Sic prima editio, et codd. Casinenses 39 et 126, Concinit lectio serm. 83, c. 3 Quesnelli et Rainaudi editiones: Simoni, inquit: Simon, ecce, etc.
So the first edition, and the Cassino codices 39 and 126. The reading of serm. 83, c. 3 agrees. The editions of Quesnel and Raynaud: Simoni, inquit: Simon, ecce, etc. ["He says to Simon: Simon, behold", etc.]
(f) ‹expostulavit vos, ut› · printed under col 151
Ita cum mss. codd. legit Hincmarus opusc. 33, huuc locum referens. In editis. cribaret. QUESN. — Prima tamen editio habet, cerneret, et similiter tres mss. Vaticani ac duo Casinenses, qui solum habent velut pro sicut. Codices collectionis 4 habent cribaret, et ita etiam legitur in serm. 83. c, 3. Paulo post in editis et aliquot inferioris uotae codd, ut non deficiat. Praetulimus praestantiores mss. Vat. 3836, et duos Casinenses, cum quibus congruit lectio serm. 83, cap. 3, in alio vetustissimo Vaticano 3835, et in Casinensi. Tres priores mss. mox omittunt aliquando; non tamen delevimus, quia in alio sermone 83 hoc adverbium ex optimis codicibus retinetur.
So, with the manuscript codices, Hincmar reads, opusc. 33, citing this passage. In the printed editions, cribaret. QUESNEL. — The first edition, however, has cerneret, and likewise three Vatican manuscripts and two of Cassino, which only have velut for sicut. The codices of collection 4 have cribaret, and so it is also read in serm. 83, c. 3. A little after, in the printed editions and some codices of lower standing, ut non deficiat. We have preferred the better manuscripts, Vat. 3836 and the two Cassino ones, with which agrees the reading of serm. 83, chap. 3, in another very ancient Vatican [manuscript], 3835, and in the Cassino one. The first three manuscripts shortly omit aliquando; we have not, however, deleted it, because in the other sermon, 83, this adverb is kept on the evidence of the best codices.
(g) ‹confirma fratres tuos,› · printed under cols 151–152
In sermone 83, c. 3, ne intretis in tentationem. Haec autem verba apud Lucam XXII, 32, in Graeco et Latino vulgato textu desunt; et solum post aliquanto leguntur v. 40. Olim vero lecta fuisse uno contextu etiam v. 32, non tantum liquet ex hoc Leonis loco, nec non etiam ex alio simili sermone 83, verum etiam ex auctore librorum de Vocatione omnium gentium lib. I, c. 24, et lib. II, c. 28, et ex Prospero in epist. ad Rufinum c. 10. qui tamen duo scriptores ante verba ne intretis, praemittunt, et rogate vel, et roga. Enimvero in quatuor antiquissimis mss. Evangeliorum libris Vercellensi, Veronensi, Corbeiensi, et Vindebonensi a nostro P. Josepho Blanchinio nuperrime editis, qui priscam lectionem referunt. haec additio pariter legitur: Et rogate ne intretis in tentationem, Hinc in Leonis textu adjicienda videntur haec verba, et rogate, quae tamen sine ullius Leoninae editionis aut codicis auctoritate noluimus inserere. Immo cum non uno tantum in sermone, sed in duobus haec verba constanter absint in omnibus editionibus omnibusque codicibus quos contulimus, ac praesertim in duobus antiquissimis Vaticanis ac certo Romanis unciali charactere exaratis, quorum unus hunc, alius alterum sermonem exhibet. Leonem sine iis verbis hunc evangelicum locum in suis libris legisse probabilissimum credimus.
In sermon 83, c. 3, ne intretis in tentationem. These words, however, are missing at Luke 22:32 in the Greek and in the Latin Vulgate text, and are read only somewhat later, at v. 40. But that they were once read in the same passage at v. 32 too is clear not only from this place of Leo, and also from the other, similar sermon 83, but also from the author of the books On the Calling of All Nations, bk. I, c. 24, and bk. II, c. 28, and from Prosper in the letter to Rufinus, c. 10; these two writers, however, put before the words ne intretis the words et rogate or et roga. Indeed, in four very ancient manuscript books of the Gospels, the Vercelli, Verona, Corbie and Vienna ones, very recently edited by our Fr Giuseppe Bianchini, which give the old reading, this addition is likewise read: Et rogate ne intretis in tentationem ["And pray that you may not enter into temptation"]. Hence the words et rogate seem to need adding in Leo's text; but without the authority of any edition or codex of Leo we have been unwilling to insert them. Rather, since these words are consistently absent not in one sermon only but in two, in all the editions and all the codices we have collated, and especially in the two very ancient Vatican [manuscripts], certainly Roman, written in uncial script, of which one gives this sermon and the other the other, we believe it most probable that Leo read this Gospel passage in his books without those words.
(h) ‹Domino Jesu Christo,› · printed under col 152
Ita Vat. et Casinens. mss. Similiter habetur serm. 83, c. 4, in quem S. Leo haec traduxit. Al, qui.
So the Vatican and Cassino manuscripts. The same is found in serm. 83, c. 4, into which St Leo carried these words over. Others, qui.
(i) ‹principem fecit,› · printed under col 152
Ita omnes editi et codices quos vidimus. Nescimus autem qua auctoritate Quesnellus post verbum fecit, posito puncto et omissa particula ut, scripserit: Si quid etiam nostris temporibus... illius est operibus deputandum; nisi quia forte aliqui codices habent est pro sit, licet habeant, ut si quid.
So all the printed editions and the codices we have seen. We do not know, however, on what authority Quesnel, putting a full stop after the word fecit and omitting the particle ut, wrote: Si quid etiam nostris temporibus... illius est operibus deputandum; unless perhaps because some codices have est for sit, although they have ut si quid.
(j) ‹suam Dominus› · printed under col 152
Al., trini. Mss. duo Quesnelli.
Others, trini. Two manuscripts of Quesnel.
(k) ‹opem suam› · printed under col 152
Quatuor codices et editi ante Quesnellum, dignatur.
Four codices and the printed editions before Quesnel, dignatur.
(l) ‹sedis ipsius› · printed under col 152; the note's letter is printed as what looks like (f), the call in the text is (l)
M. Casin. 39, meruimus habere consortem.
Cassino ms. 39, meruimus habere consortem.
The end of note (g), called in col 151, is printed at the head of the notes under this column; it is set whole in n151.